When Your Song Gets Stuck in a Political Ad: JMSN vs. Trump

Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility Skip to main content Close Download the App Get your news faster with our mobile experience Install Now 64 ° Wed 80 ° Thu 86 ° Search Search User Icon Watch White House defends government-funded Trump ad as Democrats demand answers by CAITLYN FROLO | The National News Desk Fri, September 25, 2026 at 4:56 PM 3 VIEW ALL PHOTOS NEW YORK, NEW YORK – SEPTEMBER 22: U.S.

Ah, the joys of modern politics! You might think that the most entertaining thing happening in Washington, D.C. right now is the constant bickering between parties or the latest viral meme from a congressional hearing. But hold onto your hats, folks, because it turns out the drama is also happening in the music world! Enter JMSN, the singer-songwriter who’s just found himself in a rather sticky situation thanks to a certain former president’s promotional ad.

Yes, you heard that right. The Trump administration has decided to sprinkle a little bit of musical magic into their campaign ad using JMSN’s song “Love Me”—without so much as a, “Hey, can we borrow this?” Apparently, they thought it was totally fine to just swipe it like a kid taking a cookie from the jar. But JMSN, bless his heart, had other plans.

In a move that could only be described as both bold and necessary, JMSN’s legal team has fired off a cease-and-desist letter to the White House. They’ve demanded that the administration stop using his song immediately, claiming that this little musical theft violates copyright law. Who knew that the sweet sound of music could lead to such a sour note in the political arena?

But wait, there’s more! JMSN has made it abundantly clear that he does not want to be associated with the Trump administration. I mean, can you blame him? It’s not every day you get to say, “No, thank you! I’d rather not have my art linked to that chaos, thanks!” His legal representatives have even gone so far as to argue that using the song in a taxpayer-funded ad could be considered propaganda. You know it’s serious when the word “propaganda” is thrown around. It’s almost as if they’re saying, “Hey, we’re not just stealing music; we’re stealing your trust as taxpayers!”

Now, before you rush to judgment, let’s take a moment to appreciate the absurdity of it all. A political campaign using a popular song without permission? Classic! It’s like showing up to a potluck with a store-bought cake while claiming you baked it yourself. Who knew that a simple song could turn into a legal showdown? With all the controversies swirling around, JMSN’s legal team might as well be the real rock stars here, taking on the big guys in the name of artistic integrity.

It’s also worth noting that this isn’t the first time an artist has had to battle it out with politicians over music rights. Remember when Bruce Springsteen’s “Born to Run” was used at a campaign rally without his permission? That didn’t end well either. It’s almost like politicians need a refresher course on copyright laws—or maybe just a good old-fashioned conversation about consent.

So, what’s next for JMSN? Well, if the Trump administration decides to keep using his song, they might just find themselves in a courtroom showdown. And let’s face it, nothing says “I’m a serious politician” quite like being sued by a musician.

In the end, JMSN’s stand against the unauthorized use of his music is a reminder that artists deserve respect, even in the chaotic world of politics. So, next time you hear a catchy tune in a political ad, you might want to double-check if the artist is actually on board or if they’re just as shocked as we are. Who knows, maybe JMSN will end up with a number one hit after all this—”Love Me, But Not in an Ad!” It has a nice ring to it, don’t you think?


Inspired by: “Artist Threatens Legal Action Over Trump Ad Using Song Without Permission” (r/News)