Category: Politics

Congress high command made a fresh organisational change in Telangana on Friday, appointing BM Sandeep as the All India Congress Committee (AICC) in-charge of the state with immediate effect .

In a move that has left political pundits scratching their heads and party members raising their eyebrows, the Congress party has officially appointed B M Sandeep as the new AICC in-charge for Telangana. This change comes with the graceful exit (or should we say, the not-so-graceful exit?) of Meenakshi Natarajan, who has been at the helm amidst a whirlwind of internal disagreements. You know, the kind of disagreements that usually end in shouting matches or at least a few awkward glances at the coffee machine.

Now, let’s talk about Sandeep. He’s stepping into this role right as the state assembly elections are looming on the horizon. Talk about timing! It’s like he’s been handed the baton in a relay race where everyone else is still trying to untangle their shoelaces. With Meenakshi’s tenure riddled with controversy, we can only hope that Sandeep comes equipped with a good pair of running shoes and maybe a helmet for safety.

The Congress party is clearly trying to shake things up in Telangana, and one can’t help but wonder if this is a strategic move to bolster their position in the upcoming local body elections. After all, what better way to win hearts and minds than by throwing a new face into the mix? It’s like a makeover show, but instead of hair and makeup, we’re talking about political strategies and voter appeal.

While details about Sandeep’s vision for Telangana are still emerging, one thing is for sure: he’s got his work cut out for him. With an election season that’s more competitive than a game of musical chairs at a family reunion, Sandeep will need to charm voters, smooth over any ruffled feathers left by Natarajan, and, let’s not forget, navigate the complex web of alliances and rivalries within the party. No pressure, right?

As we watch this political drama unfold, it’s essential to remember that change can be a double-edged sword. Will Sandeep be the fresh breath of air that the Congress party needs, or will he find himself trapped in the same old routine of internal squabbles and missed opportunities? Only time will tell. For now, let’s grab our popcorn and enjoy the show as Sandeep takes on this new challenge. Who knows? He might just surprise us all. Or he could end up being the punchline of a political joke. Either way, stay tuned!

Inspired by: “Congress appoints BM Sandeep as AICC Telangana in-charge” (r/News)

Prabowo orders a greater state share of mining benefits in Indonesia, saying at least 70% from permits should go to the government . Read more at straitstimes.com.

Hey there, fellow earthlings! Grab your helmets and hard hats because we’re diving into the rocky world of mining in Indonesia—where the gold and minerals are plentiful, and apparently, so are the demands from the government!

Recently, President Prabowo Subianto made quite the splash (and not the good kind that comes from a refreshing pool) by declaring that the Indonesian state needs to get a bigger slice of the mining pie. I mean, who wouldn’t want a bigger piece of the cake? Especially when it’s a cake made of precious minerals and resources!

In a speech to the members of Muhammadiyah—one of Indonesia’s largest Islamic organizations—Prabowo stated that at least 70% of the benefits from all mining permits should go to the state. Yes, you heard that right. Seventy percent! That’s more than just a generous tip at your favorite restaurant. He even mentioned the possibility of the state holding controlling stakes in mining assets. So, if you thought your landlord was tough, just wait until you see the government in action!

Now, let’s break this down a bit. The president’s statement isn’t just a whimsical idea he pulled out of a hat. This 70% chunk refers specifically to the proceeds from the management of mining permits. It seems that Prabowo is sending a clear message:

“Hey, investors! You can come play in our sandbox, but you better be ready to share your toys… and by toys, I mean profits!”

But wait, there’s more! Earlier this year, Deputy Energy Minister Yuliot Tanjung hinted at a gross-split scheme where 70% of the output would go to the government and a mere 30% to the mine operator. Sounds fair, right? Well, not so fast. Energy Minister Bahlil Lahadalia later said that this proposal was dropped after some good old-fashioned consultations with Prabowo. So, it looks like the idea of the 70/30 split went the way of the dodo bird—gone but not forgotten.

What’s interesting here is that while Prabowo is open to investors in the mining sector, he’s making it crystal clear that the profits should predominantly benefit the Indonesian people. Because, let’s be real, who wants to see all that wealth just trickle into the pockets of a few lucky mine operators? Not on his watch!

Now, you might be wondering: what does all this mean for the average Joe on the street in Indonesia? Well, if the government successfully secures this larger share of mining profits, it could mean more funds for public services, infrastructure, and perhaps even a little something extra for the citizens. Or, you know, it could just mean more bureaucratic red tape. Who doesn’t love that?

In conclusion, President Prabowo’s bold move to demand a larger share of mining benefits is certainly a conversation starter. Whether this will lead to more significant improvements for the Indonesian people or just more complicated regulations remains to be seen. But one thing’s for sure: the mining game in Indonesia is about to get a lot more interesting. So, keep your eyes peeled and your hard hats on—this is one rocky road to watch!

Inspired by: “Indonesian president orders greater share of mining benefits for the state” (r/News)

General elections are due to be held in South Sudan on 22 December 2026, the first since independence. Following the independence of South Sudan, the country’s initial constitution scheduled national elections to be held by 9 July 2015. Elections have been postponed five times to 2018, 2021, …

Well, folks, it seems like South Sudan has once again decided to hit the snooze button on their first-ever national elections. Originally slated for December 22, these elections have been postponed—again—this time to February. I mean, who doesn’t love a good cliffhanger, right? At this rate, we might as well start calling them ‘the elections that never were.’

Now, let’s take a moment to appreciate the irony here. South Sudan, a country that has been through more turmoil than a soap opera character, is trying to hold elections. But instead of a grand finale, we’re left with another season of delays. The United Nations even weighed in, warning that if they do go ahead with the voting, it could lead to widespread conflict. No pressure or anything!

So, what’s the deal with the postponements? Well, it seems like every time they get close to the big day, something comes up. Maybe they’re still trying to figure out how to operate the voting machines—or maybe they just can’t decide on the perfect shade of ballot paper. Who knows? It’s South Sudan, where the only thing more unpredictable than the weather is the election schedule.

And let’s be honest, this isn’t just a matter of rescheduling a party or a family gathering. We’re talking about a country that has faced its fair share of challenges—civil wars, economic turmoil, and a whole lot of political drama. It’s hard to blame them for wanting to take their time. After all, why rush into something that could lead to chaos?

But here’s the kicker: if they keep pushing the elections further down the road, they might just end up scheduling them for 2027. At that point, they’ll need a time machine to catch up with the rest of the world. Imagine the headlines: “South Sudan: Now Featuring Elections from the Future!”

In the meantime, we’ll just have to wait and see what February brings. Will it be a month of electoral excitement or just another episode of ‘As the Election Turns’? Grab your popcorn, folks—this is one show that seems to have no end in sight.

Inspired by: “South Sudan postpones first national elections until February” (r/World)

BUDAPEST, Nov 14 (Reuters) – Hungarian … or hidden in farm buildings and warehouses, in a bribery probe into Miklos Sesztak, a minister under former right-wing leader Viktor Orban ….

Ah, Hungary! The land of thermal baths, goulash, and now, apparently, buried cash. Yes, you heard that right. In a jaw-dropping twist that sounds like it’s straight out of a heist movie, Hungarian authorities have unearthed nearly $20 million in cash during a bribery investigation involving former minister Miklos Sesztak. So, if you thought your last treasure hunt was impressive, think again!

Let’s set the stage: it’s Budapest, and the new Prime Minister Peter Magyar is shaking things up after ousting Viktor Orban, who had been in power for a whopping 16 years. Magyar is on a mission to mend fences with the European Union, which had been giving Orban the side-eye for years, and he’s not stopping there. He’s launched an ambitious anti-corruption crusade dubbed “Operation Purgatory.” Sounds a bit dramatic, doesn’t it? Almost like it should come with a theme song.

Now, back to the cash. Imagine the scene: investigators digging through forests, rummaging through farm buildings, and peeking into warehouses. It’s like a scavenger hunt, but instead of finding a rubber duck, they’re stumbling upon millions in cash. Apparently, this cash wasn’t just sitting around waiting for someone to find it; it was buried! I mean, who knew money could play hide and seek so well?

The recovered stash includes a staggering 5.07 billion forints (that’s about $15.33 million), €2.66 million (or $2.93 million), and $1.26 million. It took a dozen State Treasury workers a full eight hours to count it all up with the help of five banknote counters. Talk about a long day at the office! I can only imagine the conversations they had while counting. “How many zeros are in a billion again?”

Miklos Sesztak, the man at the center of this cash conundrum, served as Orban’s development minister from 2014 to 2018 and is denying any wrongdoing. His lawyer, Gabor Papp, has opted for radio silence. Maybe he’s busy looking for buried treasure of his own?

But wait, there’s more! The cash recovery is just the tip of the iceberg. Two other former ministers from Orban’s government and the former central bank chief, Gyorgy Matolcsy, are also under arrest for separate graft accusations. And let’s not forget Orban’s brother, who’s been detained in a people-smuggling case that Orban himself has dismissed as political revenge. It’s like a political soap opera where everyone is a suspect, and the plot thickens with every episode.

Interestingly, a recent survey by Median revealed that 70% of respondents consider this anti-corruption drive to be “very important.” That’s a pretty significant number, indicating that the Hungarian public is not just passively watching this drama unfold. They want change, and they want it now!

In the wake of these revelations, Fidesz, Orban’s party, has seen its public support plummet to just 16%. That’s right, folks—what was once a dominant party is now struggling to keep its head above water. Maybe they should consider hiring a treasure map expert?

In conclusion, Hungary’s recent cash recovery is not just a tale of buried treasure; it’s a pivotal moment in the country’s political landscape. As Magyar pushes forward with his anti-corruption initiatives, we can only hope that this isn’t just a flashy show but a genuine effort to clean house. After all, who wouldn’t want to live in a country where money isn’t, quite literally, buried in the woods? Now that’s a place where you can feel secure knowing your taxes are going to something other than secret stashes of cash!

So, what’s next for Hungary? More treasure hunts? A political revival? Only time will tell, but for now, we can sit back and enjoy the show—preferably with a bowl of goulash in hand.

Inspired by: “Hungary recovers $20 million cash in probe of Orban minister” (r/News)

Democrat Eileen Laubacher declares victory over Rep. Lauren Boebert , flipping Colorado's 4th Congressional District

Well, folks, it looks like the winds of change have blown through Colorado’s 4th Congressional District, and they brought with them a retired Navy rear admiral named Eileen Laubacher. Yes, you heard that right! In a surprising twist that had political analysts scratching their heads and some folks throwing confetti, Laubacher defeated the incumbent Republican Representative Lauren Boebert. Who knew the elections could be as unpredictable as a cat on a hot tin roof?

Now, let’s get into the nitty-gritty of this nail-biter of a race. Laubacher managed to flip the seat from red to blue—no, not the color of a sad Smurf, but the color of a Democratic victory. Her win came after a tense ten-day wait for final vote counts, which is a reminder that in politics, patience is indeed a virtue… or a form of torture.

For those who may have been living under a rock or perhaps just not paying attention to the political circus, Boebert has been a name that often made headlines (and not always for the right reasons). Known for her outspoken nature and, let’s say, unique approach to governance, she has been a polarizing figure. But it seems that the voters decided it was time for a change. Maybe they were tired of her antics, or perhaps they just really liked the idea of a retired Navy officer representing them. Who knows? It could be a combination of both!

What’s even more intriguing is that Laubacher’s victory is part of a broader trend in Colorado, where three congressional districts previously held by Republicans have now shifted to Democratic control in this election cycle. It’s almost like the state decided to throw a political party and invited the Democrats to bring the snacks.

So, what’s next for Laubacher? Well, she’s probably busy preparing for her new role, which might involve a little less tweeting and a lot more legislating. And let’s face it, after years of Boebert’s more theatrical approach to politics, it’ll be refreshing to see someone take a more measured stance—unless, of course, Laubacher proves us all wrong and turns out to be a secret drama queen.

In conclusion, this election has served as a reminder that in politics, anything can happen. It’s like a soap opera, but with more paperwork and fewer dramatic cliffhangers—at least until the next election cycle rolls around. So, cheers to Eileen Laubacher and the new chapter in Colorado’s political saga. May it be filled with productive debates, less drama, and maybe a few less viral TikToks!

Inspired by: “Laubacher Defeats Boebert in Colorado House Race” (r/Local)

Democrat Eileen Laubacher declares victory over Rep. Lauren Boebert , flipping Colorado's 4th Congressional District

Well, folks, it looks like the winds of change are blowing through Colorado’s 4th Congressional District, and they’ve swept out Republican incumbent Lauren Boebert in favor of Democrat Eileen Laubacher. Yes, you heard that right! The former Navy rear admiral has officially made her mark in a race that was as close as your neighbor’s cat sneaking into your garage for a midnight snack.

As the votes were counted, Laubacher maintained a steady lead, ultimately winning by a nail-biting margin of about 1%. That’s right, just 1%! We’re talking about the kind of margin that makes you wonder if you should have counted your own votes after a night out with friends. But let’s not get distracted by the potential for vote recounts or the possibility of a dramatic concession speech. Right now, Boebert hasn’t conceded, which is like refusing to acknowledge that your favorite ice cream flavor has been discontinued. It’s sad but true, Lauren!

Now, if you’re wondering who exactly Eileen Laubacher is, she’s not just your average politician. This woman has a background that could make even Captain America feel a little insecure. A former Navy rear admiral, she’s got the kind of resume that screams, “I know how to lead a team and navigate through rough waters.” And let’s be honest, the political waters in Colorado have been anything but calm lately.

Boebert, on the other hand, made headlines for her outspoken views and, shall we say, unconventional approach to politics. She’s the kind of representative who could turn a simple town hall meeting into a reality show episode. But while she was busy making headlines, it seems Laubacher was busy making a plan. And it looks like that plan has paid off.

With multiple news outlets confirming the results, it seems Boebert’s time in the spotlight may be dimming. But, hey, there’s always a chance she might ask for a recount. After all, who doesn’t want to relive the suspense of election night? It’s like binge-watching a season of your favorite thriller, except with more campaign slogans and fewer plot twists.

So what does this mean for Colorado? Well, it could mean a shift in policies and priorities. Laubacher’s victory may pave the way for new initiatives and a fresh perspective on issues that matter to the constituents. And isn’t that what democracy is all about? A little bit of change, a sprinkle of hope, and a whole lot of popcorn as we watch the political drama unfold.

In conclusion, as we bid farewell to Lauren Boebert’s congressional reign, we welcome Eileen Laubacher with open arms and maybe a few skeptical raised eyebrows. After all, it’s politics – you never know what’s going to happen next. But one thing’s for sure: it’s going to be an interesting ride. So buckle up, Colorado, and let’s see where this new chapter takes us!

Inspired by: “Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado loses House seat to Democrat Eileen Laubacher” (r/News)

Amritpal Singh was granted one – day interim bail by an Amritsar court to attend his grandmother’s funeral. The court cited family and humanitarian circumstances for granting the relief.

In a turn of events that could only happen in the wild world of politics, Khadoor Sahib MP Amritpal Singh has been granted a one-day interim bail by a local court. This decision allows him to attend the last rites of his grandmother, Charan Kaur, who passed away at the age of 84 after a prolonged illness. Now, before you start thinking this is just another day in the life of a politician, let’s unpack this a bit.

First off, let’s just take a moment to recognize the emotional weight of the situation. Losing a grandparent is tough, no matter who you are. For Amritpal Singh, who is currently cooling his heels in Dibrugarh Central Jail in Assam, this must be particularly poignant. Sure, being in jail is not a picnic, but can you imagine the logistical nightmare of trying to attend a family funeral while also juggling the complexities of being a political figure? It’s not exactly a walk in the park.

Now, the court’s decision to grant him bail is certainly noteworthy. It highlights the sometimes bizarre intersection of personal tragedy and the law. On one hand, you have the legal system allowing a convicted politician a brief reprieve for a family matter, and on the other, you have the general public wondering if this is just another example of the privilege that often accompanies political life.

In a world where many people can barely get a day off work for a family emergency, it’s fascinating to see how the system bends for those in power. But hey, let’s not be too cynical here; everyone deserves a chance to say goodbye to their loved ones, even if they happen to be MPs.

As for the practicalities of Amritpal’s release, it’s not as simple as just walking out of jail with a wave and a smile. His arrival in Amritsar is contingent on various logistical arrangements. One can only imagine the behind-the-scenes chaos that’s happening right now. Picture it: prison guards, family members, and possibly a few overly eager media personnel all scrambling to make sure he gets there in time. It’s like planning a wedding, but with more handcuffs and less cake.

Moreover, this incident shines a light on the often tumultuous relationship between politics and family life. MPs are not just politicians; they are human beings with families and emotions. This is a reminder that behind every headline, there’s a personal story. Amritpal Singh’s situation might be wrapped in political drama, but at its core, it’s about loss, love, and the sometimes messy reality of life.

In conclusion, while we can’t ignore the political implications of this bail and what it means for Singh’s career, let’s also take a moment to reflect on the human side of the story. After all, in the grand scheme of life, family always comes first – even for a jailed MP. So here’s to Amritpal Singh, may he find comfort in the memories of his grandmother as he navigates the unpredictable waters of both grief and politics. And who knows, perhaps this experience will bring a little humanity back into the political arena. But let’s not hold our breath.

Inspired by: “Jailed Punjab MP Amritpal granted one-day bail for grandmother’s last rites” (r/World)

Mr Dagan's entry ban was coordinated alongside earlier bans on ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, with whom he is closely aligned. The Israeli foreign ministry condemned the ban as "completely unacceptable", saying settlement activity "is contrary to international law and undermines the two-state solution".

Well, folks, grab your popcorn because the political drama between France and Israel just took a spicy turn. In a move that has many scratching their heads, Israel has decided to ban French presidential candidate Jean-Luc Mélenchon and Mathilde Panot, the head honcho of his party, France Unbowed, from entering the country. Why, you ask? Apparently, it’s all because of the duo’s ‘extreme anti-Israel stance.’ Talk about a diplomatic spat!

Now, let’s break this down. Mélenchon is known for his hard-left views, which, as you can imagine, don’t exactly sit well with everyone. In fact, his party has made headlines for its outspoken criticism of Israel’s policies. So, it seems Israel took a page from the “let’s not invite people who disagree with us to the party” handbook. I mean, who needs dissenting opinions, right?

But wait, there’s more! France, not one to back down from a verbal joust, has criticized Israel’s decision as “demagogic.” Yes, that’s right—France is throwing around the big D-word. It’s like they’re saying, “Hey Israel, this is not how you handle political disagreements; you don’t just ban people because they don’t agree with you!” Because, you know, that’s how mature democracies operate.

This whole situation raises a few eyebrows. Is banning political figures a new trend we should be concerned about? Should we start preparing a list of people who might be banned from various countries based on their opinions? Imagine the chaos at airports: “Sorry, sir, you can’t board your flight to France because you once tweeted something about cheese that didn’t sit well with the French government.” The horror!

Back to Mélenchon and Panot. They’re not exactly shrinking violets when it comes to their positions. They’ve made it clear that they stand firmly against what they perceive as injustices in Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. And while everyone is entitled to their opinion, it seems Israel has decided to take a more, shall we say, exclusionary approach to dissent.

In the grand scheme of things, this ban might seem like just another day in the world of international politics, but it’s a reminder of how quickly things can escalate. One minute you’re discussing policy differences, and the next, you’re issuing travel bans like they’re party favors.

So, what’s next in this saga? Will Mélenchon and Panot find a way to circumvent the ban? Will they turn it into a campaign rallying cry? Only time will tell. But one thing is for sure: this political drama is far from over, and we’ll be keeping our eyes peeled for the next plot twist. Until then, let’s just hope that the world doesn’t turn into a giant game of ‘who can get banned next.’

Stay tuned, folks, and remember: politics is just like a reality show, but with fewer confetti cannons and more serious consequences.

Inspired by: “France criticises ‘demagogic’ move by Israel to ban hard-left leader Melenchon” (r/News)

"The IOC is very disappointed to note that, once again, issues and disputes seem to have resurfaced in the conduct of the IOA election process and in the implementation of the rules governing the IOA elections , despite all the efforts made over …

Ah, the Olympics! A time when nations come together to celebrate athleticism, camaraderie, and, apparently, a whole lot of drama. If you thought the Olympic Games were the pinnacle of competition, you clearly haven’t been keeping up with the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) and their recent election escapades.

In what can only be described as an ‘extremely regrettable situation’—a phrase that sounds like it was plucked straight from a politician’s speech—the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has weighed in on the ongoing mess surrounding the IOA elections. You know it’s serious when the IOC feels the need to intervene, reminding everyone that the reputation of India’s Olympic movement is on the line. I mean, who doesn’t love a little international scrutiny, right?

So, what’s the drama? Well, P T Usha, the current IOA President, has alleged that her failure to secure a spot on the Sportspersons of Outstanding Merit (SOMs) panel was due to some serious behind-the-scenes maneuvering. Apparently, other candidates were playing dirty, influenced by unseen external forces. Sounds like a plot twist worthy of a Bollywood film, if you ask me.

The IOC, in its infinite wisdom, is calling for a fair election process—without any external interference. Because, as we all know, fair play is the cornerstone of sportsmanship, unless you’re talking about the politics of sports, in which case, all bets are off. The IOC’s plea is essentially a reminder that while athletes sweat it out on the field, the real games are often happening in boardrooms and election booths. Who needs the Olympics when you have this level of drama unfolding right at home?

But let’s not forget the implications here. The IOC’s statement isn’t just a slap on the wrist; it’s a wake-up call. If India’s Olympic movement continues to be mired in controversy, it risks losing credibility on the global stage. And we all know how much India loves to showcase its athletic prowess. It’s like showing up to a potluck and forgetting to bring your signature dish—awkward and a little embarrassing.

So, what’s next for the IOA? Will they clean up their act and ensure that future elections are as transparent as a freshly Windexed window? Or will this saga continue to unfold like a poorly scripted drama? Only time will tell. But one thing’s for sure: the IOC is watching closely, and they won’t hesitate to call out any shenanigans.

In conclusion, while we all love a good underdog story at the Olympics, let’s hope the IOA can sort out its issues before it becomes the next big scandal. After all, we want our athletes to shine, not just in competition, but also in the integrity of the process that brings them there.

So, here’s to hoping for a fair election, a clean slate, and perhaps a little less drama. Because let’s be honest, we have enough of that in our daily lives, thank you very much!

Inspired by: “Negatively affecting reputation of India’s Olympic movement: International Olympic Committee react…” (r/News)

Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra on Friday (November 13, 2026) said Opposition parties had not been informed about any move by the Union government to convene a special session of Parliament to pass the proposed Delimitation Bill .

So, grab your popcorn and settle in, because Priyanka Gandhi has just thrown a big ol’ spotlight on a rather curious situation involving the Indian Parliament. According to the Congress MP, the Opposition seems to have been left out of the loop regarding a potential special session focused on delimitation. Now, if you’re like me and wondering what on earth delimitation is, let’s just say it’s a fancy term for redrawing the boundaries of electoral constituencies. And, trust me, it’s as riveting as it sounds.

Priyanka Gandhi has voiced her frustrations, claiming that dissenting voices are being silenced. It’s like a game of telephone gone wrong, where the government has decided to play a secretive version of ‘who gets to know what.’ Apparently, the Opposition was not given a heads-up about this special session, which raises a few eyebrows. Are we to believe that the government decided to drop this bombshell without a single courtesy call? I mean, come on! It’s like planning a surprise party but forgetting to invite half the guests. Awkward!

The Congress MP’s comments have sparked a wave of discussions, with many wondering if this is a strategic move by the government to sideline the Opposition. After all, keeping your rivals in the dark is a classic tactic—especially when you’re discussing something as crucial as delimitation that could affect electoral dynamics.

Now, we could dive into the nitty-gritty of how delimitation affects representation in Parliament, but let’s be real—most of us would rather watch paint dry than sift through those details. The bottom line is that when the government decides to have a pow-wow about how we’re represented, it’s probably a good idea to include everyone in the conversation.

Priyanka Gandhi’s remarks are part of a larger narrative where the Opposition has been vocal about feeling sidelined. It’s like being the kid left out of a group project—everyone else gets to make the decisions, and you’re just sitting there, wondering if you should just do the work yourself and hope for the best. But hey, at least you can pretend you were on vacation while they made all those choices without you.

In the end, it’s a classic case of politics being politics. Will this lead to more protests? More drama? Probably. But one thing’s for sure: the next time the government plans a special session, they might want to send out a few more invitations. Because nobody likes being the last one to find out about the party, especially when it’s about something as important as our electoral future.

So, stay tuned, folks! This political saga is just getting started, and who knows what twists and turns it will take next. In the meantime, let’s hope for some transparency—or at least a group chat invitation!

Inspired by: “Opposition not informed about possible Special Parliament session on delimitation: Priyanka Gandhi” (r/World)