Category: Politics

Here’s how it works. … Several counties in the U.S. have put data center concerns on the midterm ballot, and early results show that Americans are overwhelmingly voting against them .

In a shocking turn of events that has left tech giants scratching their heads and data center developers reaching for the nearest comfort food, voters across nine states have decisively rejected the expansion of data centers during the recent midterm elections. Yes, you heard that right. It seems that when given the choice, Americans would rather not have their neighborhoods filled with vast warehouses humming with servers and blinking lights. Who knew?

In total, 45 measures concerning data center development made it onto ballots across ten states. And let’s just say, the results were about as one-sided as a toddler’s tantrum. Out of those 45 measures, a whopping 33 passed. That’s right, 33! These measures included moratoriums, outright bans, and operational restrictions. Meanwhile, only one measure failed, with the remaining five still hanging in limbo, possibly trying to figure out how to win over the hearts and minds of voters.

So, what gives? Why this sudden wave of anti-data center sentiment? Well, it turns out that many citizens are quite concerned about the impact these facilities can have on their communities. You know, things like increased traffic, noise pollution, and the fear that their quaint little towns might morph into tech wastelands overnight. Not to mention, there’s the whole energy consumption debate. Data centers are known for guzzling electricity like it’s going out of style, and let’s be honest, no one wants to be the neighborhood that’s perpetually dimmed to save power for a server farm.

This rejection of data center development has become a hot topic across multiple races, with candidates incorporating these concerns into their campaign messaging. It’s almost like a scene from a political drama where candidates rally their supporters with promises to protect their communities from the encroaching tech giants. Who knew that a good ol’ fashioned neighborhood watch could extend to tech infrastructure?

In a world where technology is often hailed as the savior of humanity, it’s refreshing to see voters taking a stand and prioritizing their local environments over the allure of shiny new tech. It’s a reminder that while we might love our gadgets, we also love our peace and quiet—and the occasional backyard barbecue without the hum of servers drowning out the sound of laughter.

In conclusion, the midterm elections have revealed a clear message: Americans are not ready to turn their communities into tech hubs just yet. So, to all the data center developers out there, it might be time to hit the pause button and rethink your strategy. Or at least invest in some really good earplugs. After all, it seems the voters have spoken loud and clear, and they’re not interested in any data-driven developments for now.

Inspired by: “AI data centers comprehensively defeated at US midterm elections — 45 measures put on the ballot as…” (r/Tech)

The post came after Democrats made major gains in the House and Senate. Midterm elections determine the makeup of Congress, and the White House message emphasized that Trump remained president .

Well, folks, it seems like the political circus just got a little more interesting! In a recent twist, White House aide Steven Cheung has decided to unleash his inner cheerleader, reminding everyone that Donald Trump is still your president—even after the midterm elections didn’t exactly go his way. This statement has sparked a whirlwind of reactions, and honestly, it’s like watching a dog chase its tail—amusing yet slightly concerning.

After the Democrats swept the midterms, you might expect some somber reflections from the White House. But no! Instead, we got a message that brings to mind a toddler who just lost a game of Candyland, insisting they’re still the king of the board. Cheung’s declaration is clear: regardless of the election outcomes, Trump’s reign is not over!

Let’s unpack this a little. The midterm elections have historically been a time for the party that occupies the White House to feel the heat. It’s like the universe’s way of saying, “Hey, remember that time you thought you could do whatever you wanted? Well, here’s a reality check!” Yet, here we are, with the White House doubling down on the idea that Trump is still your president. It’s almost as if they believe that repeating it will somehow make it true.

I can’t help but chuckle at the sheer audacity of it. It’s a classic case of ‘if we say it enough, maybe we’ll convince ourselves.’ The White House’s messaging has been described by some as ‘unhinged’—and honestly, who wouldn’t agree? It’s like they’re trying to turn back the clock, but the clock has already struck midnight, and Cinderella is long gone.

The White House has taken to social media and press releases to hammer this point home. It’s like they’re trying to create a new political mantra: “Trump: The President Who Will Not Die!” Okay, maybe not that dramatic, but you get the gist. They’re trying desperately to remind everyone that Trump is still the figurehead of the party, despite the fact that many voters seem to have moved on.

But what does this really mean for the future? Is the White House trying to galvanize Trump’s base for the next election cycle? Are they hoping that by shouting into the void, they can somehow rally the troops? It’s hard to say, but you have to admire (or maybe pity) the sheer determination behind it. It’s like watching someone trying to convince a room full of people that pineapple belongs on pizza—some will agree, some will roll their eyes, and most will just want to change the subject.

In the end, Cheung’s bold proclamation is a reminder of the bizarre landscape of American politics. While the Democrats might be celebrating their midterm victories, Team Trump is still playing the long game, hoping to remind everyone that they’re not going anywhere anytime soon. So, buckle up, folks! It looks like the political rollercoaster is just getting started, and trust me, it’s going to be one wild ride. Whether you’re a fan of Trump or not, one thing is for sure: it’s going to be hard to look away from this spectacle!

Inspired by: “White House aide Steven Cheung rages Trump is ‘still your president’ after midterm loss” (r/News)

As for Ireland, Gerry Thornley predicts that Andrew Porter, Ryan Baird and Mack Hansen , who all missed both the Six Nations Championship and the three-match southern series of the Nations Championship, could be restored to the starting lineup …

Well, well, well! Just when you thought you had Ireland’s rugby lineup all figured out, Andy Farrell pulls a rabbit out of his coaching hat. In a move that has left fans and analysts alike scratching their heads (and possibly muttering under their breath), Farrell has named Craig Casey and Nick Timoney to start against Argentina. Talk about a surprise!

Now, I know what you’re thinking: “Who are these guys?” And to that, I say, you clearly haven’t been keeping up with the rugby scene. Craig Casey, a scrum-half with a knack for getting the ball out faster than you can say ‘try’, and Nick Timoney, a back-row dynamo who can tackle like a freight train, are stepping into the spotlight.

This decision comes as part of a larger shake-up, with a whopping seven changes to the team. That’s right, SEVEN! If you thought the Irish lineup was set in stone, think again. Farrell seems to be channeling his inner mad scientist, ready to experiment with combinations that could either lead to a masterpiece or a complete disaster.

Let’s take a moment to appreciate the audacity of this choice. In the world of sports, especially rugby, consistency is often key. But Farrell seems to be playing 4D chess while the rest of us are still figuring out checkers. Maybe he’s hoping that throwing in Casey and Timoney will inject some fresh energy into the squad. Or maybe he just wants to see how many times he can make sports commentators say “Casey and Timoney” in one match.

Of course, this isn’t just about shaking things up for the sake of it. The Irish team has a formidable opponent in Argentina, a side known for their tenacity and flair. Farrell’s gamble could pay off if Casey and Timoney rise to the occasion and prove that they belong on this stage.

So, what does this mean for the game? Well, it’s going to be a real spectacle. Expect the unexpected as these two players look to make their mark. Fans will be watching closely, probably with a mix of excitement and terror, as they hope this gamble pays off.

In conclusion, whether this bold strategy will lead to glory or a facepalm moment remains to be seen. But one thing’s for sure: Andy Farrell is not afraid to shake things up. So grab your popcorn, folks, because this match is shaping up to be a thrilling ride. Let’s just hope Casey and Timoney are ready to deliver the goods!

Inspired by: “Andy Farrell springs a big surprise as Craig Casey and Nick Timoney named to start for Ireland agai…” (r/News)

The satire targets recent controversies and political ties. … The Edenbridge Bonfire Society in Kent has unveiled a satirical 36ft effigy of FIFA President Gianni Infantino for its annual Bonfire Night festivities.

Ah, Bonfire Night! That glorious time of year when the British gather around roaring fires to celebrate the foiling of a plot to blow up Parliament. And what better way to commemorate this historical event than with a giant effigy? This year, the town of Kent has taken it to a whole new level by crafting an 11-metre tall effigy of FIFA chief Gianni Infantino, and just for kicks (pun intended), he’s carrying the head of none other than Donald Trump.

Now, if you’re wondering why on earth a British town decided to roast a Swiss-Italian football executive along with a former American president, you’re not alone. It seems like the perfect recipe for a night of laughter, confusion, and perhaps some very spirited debates over a pint or two.

Let’s break this down, shall we? First off, we have Gianni Infantino, the man who has made headlines for his rather ambitious plans to expand the World Cup to 48 teams. (Because who doesn’t love an overcrowded tournament?) And then there’s Donald Trump, the king of controversial statements and questionable hair choices. Together, they make quite the duo—like peanut butter and jelly, if both were a bit stale and had a history of questionable decisions.

The effigy itself, towering at a whopping 11 metres, is not just a sight to behold but also a statement. It seems the residents of Kent have a lot to say about the world of football and politics, and they’re not afraid to say it in flames. The decision to include Trump’s head is particularly interesting, as it adds a layer of political commentary to the mix. After all, who doesn’t want to see a giant version of a former president’s head go up in flames? It’s practically a rite of passage in British satire.

As the townsfolk prepare for Bonfire Night, you can almost hear the excited chatter about how this effigy will be received. Will it spark applause, laughter, or a heated debate about the ethics of burning effigies? One thing is for sure: it’s bound to be a conversation starter.

The tradition of burning effigies dates back centuries, and while it typically involves Guy Fawkes, it seems that the Kent crowd decided to spice things up this year. Who knew that the combination of football and politics could lead to such a creative and bold statement?

So, as the flames leap higher and the effigy of Infantino (with Trump’s head, of course) goes up in smoke, let’s take a moment to appreciate the creativity behind it all. Because if there’s one thing we can agree on, it’s that in a world full of chaos, sometimes the best way to cope is to laugh—preferably while watching a giant figure burn in a controlled environment. Cheers to Bonfire Night and all the fiery political commentary it brings!

Inspired by: “Giant effigy of FIFA chief Gianni Infantino carrying Donald Trump’s head to be burned in British to…” (r/News)

Addressing Vance, El-Sayed called … … "JD, Habibi, there is this delicious irony in the fact that you're constitutionally obligated to swear me in, in January ," the 42-year-old Democrat said….

Well folks, grab your popcorn because politics just served up a delicious slice of irony, and it’s tastier than a double-decker cheeseburger on a Friday night. Our main character in this political drama? None other than Abdul El-Sayed, who recently celebrated a significant victory in his quest for a seat in the U.S. Senate. But the twist that has everyone buzzing is that he’s set to be sworn in by none other than JD Vance, a name that’s been making waves in recent political waters.

Now, if you’re wondering why this is particularly juicy, let’s break it down. El-Sayed, who’s been vocal about his progressive values, is now in a position where he’ll be sworn in by a guy who has a reputation for being anything but progressive. It’s like being served a vegan salad by a barbecue pitmaster; it just doesn’t add up. During his victory speech, El-Sayed couldn’t help but savor the moment, calling it a ‘delicious irony.’ And honestly, can you blame him?

Picture this: El-Sayed, a rising star in the Democratic party, is all about change and progress, while Vance has been closely associated with the more traditional, and let’s be real, often outdated values of the GOP. It’s like putting a cat and a dog in the same room and expecting them to get along. The odds are slim, but the entertainment value is through the roof!

In the world of politics, where every handshake is calculated and every word is scrutinized, El-Sayed’s comments are a breath of fresh air. He’s not just playing the game; he’s flipping the board over and tossing the pieces like confetti. “Call me Senator!” he declared, with a cheeky nod to the absurdity of the situation. It’s a bold move, one that shows he’s not afraid to poke fun at the very system he’s stepping into.

Of course, this isn’t just about laughs and irony; it’s about what it represents. El-Sayed’s win signals a shift in the political landscape, one where fresh ideas and diverse voices are starting to make some serious noise. In a country that often feels divided, his victory is a reminder that change is possible, even if it means sharing a stage with someone whose views might not align with his own.

So, here’s to Abdul El-Sayed, who’s not only breaking barriers but also serving up some piping hot irony. As for JD Vance, well, he’ll just have to put on his best ‘political poker face’ and play along. After all, in the game of politics, sometimes you have to smile and shake hands with the very people you might not agree with. Who knew political irony could be so… delicious?

Inspired by: “‘JD, Habibi’: El-Sayed jokes about ‘delicious irony’ of Vance having to swear him into US Senate” (r/World)

Giovanni Vincenzo "Gianni" Infantino (born 23 March 1970) is a Swiss football administrator who has served as the president of FIFA since 2016. He was previously Secretary General of UEFA from 2009 to 2016, where he formalised the body’s financial regulations and oversaw tournament expansion, …

So, it seems like FIFA President Gianni Infantino is in a bit of a pickle—or should I say, a soccer ball? After the Democrats took control of the US Congress, the spotlight is back on Infantino, and this time it’s not just about questionable World Cup bids or the number of times he can smile in one press conference. No, this time it’s about his connections to none other than Donald Trump. Yes, that Donald Trump.

Now, if you thought the only drama in the world of soccer was about VAR decisions or players diving for penalties, think again! Infantino’s ties to Trump have been under scrutiny, and it seems that the political landscape is shifting faster than a Cristiano Ronaldo sprint down the wing.

But why are people suddenly interested in Infantino’s political connections? Well, it’s a combination of factors. The Democrats, now in power, have a knack for digging up old bones—or should I say, old soccer balls? They might just want to see how deep Infantino’s ties to Trump really go. After all, it’s not every day you find a FIFA president who might have a few tea parties with a former US president.

Critics have already started sharpening their pitchforks, ready to question Infantino about his relationship with Trump. Was it a friendly chat over golf? A discussion about the best burgers in America? Or perhaps a secret handshake that guarantees FIFA’s support for Trump’s next campaign? Who knows! But you can bet your last soccer jersey that questions will be flying faster than a rogue ball off a player’s foot.

And let’s face it, Infantino has had his fair share of controversies. From the infamous Qatar World Cup to the ongoing debates about player welfare, the man has had to dodge more controversies than a player dodges a red card. Now, with political ties being dragged into the mix, it’s like adding fuel to an already raging fire.

As we move forward, it’ll be interesting to see how Infantino handles these inquiries. Will he give a masterclass in dodging questions like a seasoned politician, or will he tackle the issue head-on like a defender in the penalty box? Either way, grab your popcorn because this is going to be one match worth watching.

In conclusion, whether you love or loathe Gianni Infantino, one thing is for sure: the world of soccer and politics is a wild ride. And if there’s anything we’ve learned from this saga, it’s that sometimes, the pitch isn’t just where the game is played—it’s also where the drama unfolds. So, stay tuned, folks! This is one story that’s just getting started.

Inspired by: “Fifa president Gianni Infantino could face questions over Donald Trump links after Democrats take U…” (r/Sport)

NBC News projects that Ford, Nevada’s attorney general, has flipped control of the governorship in the key battleground state.

In what can only be described as a political plot twist worthy of a Netflix series, Democrat Aaron Ford has pulled off a stunning upset in Nevada, unseating sitting Republican Governor Joe Lombardo. If you’re wondering how this happened, grab your popcorn because we’re about to dive into the whirlwind of this blistering campaign.

First off, let’s set the stage. Nevada, a state that’s become known for its wild card status in elections, has now added another layer of drama to its political landscape. Ford’s victory is not just a win for the Democrats; it marks a significant milestone as he becomes Nevada’s first Black governor. Talk about making history and headlines!

Ford, who was previously the Attorney General, ran a campaign that can only be described as fierce. He didn’t just come to play; he came to win. With the charisma of a seasoned politician and the tenacity of someone who just lost their last slice of pizza, Ford took to the ground with a message that resonated with many Nevadans. This wasn’t just about party lines; it was about the issues that matter—education, healthcare, and those pesky rising costs of living that seem to be a universal concern.

On the flip side, we have Joe Lombardo, who perhaps thought he had a secure grip on the governor’s mansion. After all, sitting governors typically have the upper hand, right? But Lombardo’s campaign seemed more like a gentle stroll through the park than the sprint Ford was running. Perhaps he underestimated the power of a well-organized grassroots campaign and the sheer determination of voters ready for change. Or maybe he was too busy polishing his trophy from the last election.

As the dust settles, political analysts are scratching their heads trying to decode what went wrong for Lombardo. Was it a failure to connect with the electorate? A misstep in addressing key issues? Or did Ford just have the more appealing lawn signs? In the age of social media, sometimes it’s the small things that tip the scales.

And let’s not forget the impact of Ford’s campaign strategy. He harnessed the power of social media, connecting with younger voters who are often overlooked in elections. It’s as if he realized that an Instagram story might just be more effective than a 30-minute TV ad. Who knew that a well-timed meme could be the secret sauce to winning an election?

As we look ahead, Ford’s victory could signal a shift in Nevada politics. With a fresh face in the governor’s office, there’s potential for new policies and a renewed focus on pressing issues. It’s a chance for Ford to prove that he can deliver on his promises and bring the change he campaigned for. No pressure, right?

In conclusion, Aaron Ford’s upset victory is a testament to the changing tides in American politics. It reminds us that in the world of elections, anything can happen. So, to all the aspiring politicians out there, take note: sometimes, all it takes is a little grit, a lot of passion, and maybe a catchy slogan or two. And remember, never underestimate the power of a well-executed campaign. Who knows, the next election might just be your time to shine!

Inspired by: “Dem AG pulls off upset of sitting Republican governor after blistering campaign in key swing state” (r/News)

The war was among the issues that shaped voters’ decisions, alongside concerns such as the cost of living. Donald Trump said he thought it played a role in Republicans’ defeat.

So, the dust has settled on the U.S. midterm elections, and it seems the Democrats are gearing up to take control of both houses of Congress. Cue the confetti, right? But wait, there’s a twist! Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf has stepped into the spotlight, declaring that Americans have said “no to war.” Yes, you heard that right. Apparently, the fate of international relations hinges on the results of a midterm election. Who knew?

Ghalibaf took to social media to share his thoughts, which is basically the modern-day equivalent of shouting into a crowded room. He warned that if the U.S. government goes against the will of its people, there could be consequences. It’s like he’s saying, “Hey, America, you voted for peace, so don’t go messing it up!” You can almost hear the collective eye rolls coming from Washington.

Now, let’s break this down a bit. The midterm elections are often seen as a referendum on the sitting president’s policies, and this time, it seems like the Democrats are riding a wave of anti-war sentiment. Or at least that’s what Ghalibaf is banking on. The irony here is delicious. For years, Iran has been on the receiving end of U.S. military actions and sanctions, and now they’re using the midterms as a barometer for American sentiment against war. It’s like the kid who gets bullied at school suddenly becoming the hall monitor.

But let’s not forget the context. The U.S. has been involved in military conflicts for decades, and there’s a growing fatigue among the American populace regarding endless wars. So, when Ghalibaf claims that Americans are saying “no to war,” it’s not entirely unfounded. After all, who really wants to pay taxes for wars when you could be using that money for, I don’t know, literally anything else?

Of course, whether or not this sentiment will have any actual impact on U.S. foreign policy remains to be seen. History has shown us that sometimes the government doesn’t really listen to the will of the people – shocking, I know. But Ghalibaf’s comments do highlight a significant moment in U.S.-Iran relations. It’s like a game of chess where one player suddenly decides to flip the board and declare victory.

In conclusion, while Ghalibaf may be reading too much into the midterm results, his comments serve as a reminder that the world is watching. Whether Americans truly said “no to war” or not, it’s clear that the desire for peace is a sentiment that resonates across borders. Who knows? Maybe this midterm election will be the catalyst for a new chapter in international relations. Or maybe it’ll just lead to more political ads next election cycle. Either way, stay tuned!

And remember, if you’re ever in doubt about international politics, just check social media. That’s where all the real news happens, right?

Inspired by: “‘Americans said no to war’: Iran reacts to US midterm election results as Democrats head to flip Co…” (r/World)

President Donald Trump called in to Fox News early Wednesday morning, where he congratulated Democrats on their wins in the midterm elections , after earlier emphasizing on social media that he was not on the ballot and claiming Republicans would …

Well, folks, it seems like we’re living in a world where pigs might just take flight. Donald Trump, the man who once said he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and still not lose voters, has taken a moment to congratulate the Democrats on their midterm elections victory. Yes, you heard that right! It’s as if the sun rose in the west and set in the east. Let’s unpack this surprising turn of events.

First off, this isn’t your usual Trumpian behavior. We’re all accustomed to him throwing shade like he’s a professional meteorologist. So, seeing him extend a congratulatory hand (even if it’s more of a reluctant finger wave) is a bit like spotting a unicorn in a field of horses. The former president acknowledged the Democrats’ success, which is like saying the sky is blue—obvious, yet shocking coming from him.

In his remarks, Trump didn’t just stop at giving a nod to the opposition. He also pointed fingers at the Iran war, suggesting it played a role in the Republican Party’s lackluster performance. Now, let’s pause here for a second. Since when did the Iran war become the scapegoat for everything? I mean, I can see it now: ‘Honey, why are we late to dinner?’ ‘Oh, you know, the Iran war.’ It’s almost as if he’s saying, ‘Hey, don’t blame me and my party—look over there at the Middle East!’ Classic deflection, right?

But let’s give credit where it’s due. Acknowledging that external factors might have influenced the election results is an unusual admission for Trump. It’s almost like he’s trying to play nice, perhaps in hopes of winning back some of those moderate voters who might have been put off by his usual antics. But come on, let’s not kid ourselves; this is still the same man who can make a compliment sound like an insult.

Meanwhile, the Democrats are probably sitting back, sipping their victory lattes, and wondering what on earth just happened. They might even be feeling a bit smug, which is a rare treat in the political arena. After all, it’s not every day that they get a shout-out from the former president, even if it comes with a side of blame.

In the grand scheme of things, this moment highlights how unpredictable politics can be. Just when you think you’ve seen it all, Trump goes and does something like this, leaving political analysts scratching their heads and wondering if they need to adjust their predictions.

So, what does this mean for the future? Will we see Trump throwing more compliments in the direction of the Democrats? Or is this just a one-off, a fleeting moment of clarity before he returns to his usual schtick? Only time will tell. But for now, enjoy the show, folks. The political circus is always entertaining, especially when you throw in a few unexpected plot twists. Let’s just hope the pigs stay grounded while we navigate this wild ride.

Inspired by: “Trump congratulates Democrats on midterms win, says Iran war played role” (r/World)

The Justice Department has escalated … with the Republican incumbent, issuing a letter to a prominent Democratic attorney in Washington and others that they may be targets of the criminal inquiry. …

Well, folks, it looks like the Justice Department has decided to take a little holiday trip to the great state of Alaska, and not for the scenic views or the salmon fishing. Nope, they’re there to investigate some rather murky electoral shenanigans involving a certain Daniel J. Sullivan Jr., who, in a plot twist that could rival a soap opera, is running as an independent candidate for the U.S. Senate. And just to keep things interesting, he shares a name with the current Republican senator, Dan Sullivan. Talk about confusing the voters!

Now, before you start picturing a bunch of confused Alaskans standing in front of the ballot box, scratching their heads, let’s break down what’s really going on. The DOJ has issued target letters to about 20 individuals, mostly Democrats, which sounds a bit like a party invitation but with a much less festive vibe. These letters indicate that the recipients might be in the crosshairs of a federal investigation, particularly concerning allegations of candidate recruitment and, wait for it, potential ballot-stacking activities. Yes, it’s as shady as it sounds.

So, what’s this all about? The main concern is that Democrats may have been trying to pull a fast one by recruiting someone with a name that’s almost identical to the Republican incumbent. It’s like naming your kid after a celebrity to get more Instagram followers—except in this case, it’s about votes. The idea here is that if voters get confused at the polls, they might accidentally vote for the wrong Sullivan. Oops! Talk about a case of mistaken identity!

The recipients of these target letters have been advised to preserve relevant records, which I assume means they’re being told to hold onto anything that could be used to prove they weren’t up to no good. You know, like that one time you accidentally sent a text to your boss instead of your best friend—only this time, it might have legal implications.

The backdrop to this investigation is as politically charged as a high school cafeteria. The Trump administration’s DOJ is taking what some sources describe as ‘highly unusual’ actions against Democrats in Alaska. It’s almost like a subplot from a political thriller, where the bad guys are trying to outsmart the good guys, but in this case, it’s all happening in the state known for its vast wilderness and moose crossings.

As we ponder the implications of this investigation, it’s worth noting that political antics are hardly new, but the stakes seem to be getting higher as the election season heats up. With the DOJ breathing down the necks of these individuals, you can bet that the drama will unfold with all the flair of a reality TV show. Will there be accusations? Denials? Maybe even a few tearful confessions? Stay tuned, because Alaska’s political scene just got a lot more interesting.

In conclusion, the investigation into the Alaska Senate race is shaping up to be a wild ride. With names being tossed around, potential legal ramifications, and the looming specter of voter confusion, it’s clear that this story is far from over. So grab your popcorn, folks, because this is one political saga you won’t want to miss!

Inspired by: “DOJ Sends Target Letters in Alaska Senate Probe” (r/Politics)