Category: AI

Ah, AI chatbots—the modern-day oracles of the internet! You ask a question, and voilà, you get an answer. But hold your horses! It seems that when it comes to medical advice, these digital wizards are more like the town crier with a bad case of the hiccups. Recent tests have shown that AI chatbots are failing miserably in the realm of medical misinformation, serving up a delightful platter of inaccurate and fabricated advice. Buckle up, folks, because we’re diving into this digital disaster.

Related reading: Original source

First off, let’s set the stage. You’re feeling under the weather, and in a moment of sheer desperation, you turn to an AI chatbot for guidance. It’s like asking the family dog for stock tips—sure, it’s entertaining, but it’s probably not going to end well. AI systems are trained on vast amounts of data, but they lack the critical thinking skills and medical expertise that a human doctor brings to the table. So, what do you get? A mix of good intentions and accidental chaos.

Here’s the kicker: AI chatbots often regurgitate information that sounds plausible but is about as accurate as a weather forecast in a hurricane. They can concoct answers that sound authoritative, but they’re often based on outdated or incorrect data. It’s like searching for reliable advice in a game of Telephone—by the time it reaches your ears, it’s a garbled mess of nonsense.

Now, let’s talk about the elephant in the room—the implications of this misinformation. Imagine someone with a serious health concern turning to an AI chatbot and receiving advice to drink pickle juice and dance a jig under a full moon. Sure, it might make for a fun TikTok video, but it won’t do much for their health. The potential risks of AI-generated medical misinformation are enormous. We’re talking about real people making real decisions based on the whims of a digital genie!

So why do we keep turning to these chatbots, you ask? Well, it’s a classic case of convenience versus caution. We live in an instant gratification world where people want immediate answers without the hassle of booking a doctor’s appointment. But sometimes, rushing into things can lead to a trip down the rabbit hole of misinformation. In other words, the quicker you get your answers, the more likely they are to be wrong.

And let’s not forget the responsibility of developers. It’s like handing a toddler a paintbrush and saying, “Have at it!” without any supervision. AI developers need to be held accountable for the accuracy of the information their chatbots provide. After all, we wouldn’t accept a self-driving car that occasionally decides to take a detour through a grocery store parking lot, right?

In conclusion, while AI chatbots might be the life of the party when it comes to trivia or light banter, they should not be your go-to source for medical advice. The stakes are too high, and the potential for misinformation is too great. So the next time you think about asking an AI for health advice, remember: Sometimes it’s better to trust a medical professional over a digital buddy with a penchant for wrong answers. Your health is worth it!

Inspired by: “AI chatbots fail medical misinformation test, returning inaccurate and fabricated advice” (r/technology)

So, picture this: you’re at a dinner party, and AI walks in. It’s awkwardly clutching a plate of algorithms and trying to make small talk about the weather. You ask it about faith, and suddenly it’s like watching a toddler trying to explain quantum physics. Welcome to the world where artificial intelligence stumbles on questions of faith!

Related reading: Original source

Now, let’s be real: AI is great at crunching numbers, predicting trends, and even recommending the perfect pizza topping (pineapple lovers, I see you). But when it comes to spirituality, the whole thing turns into a game of ‘What’s My Line?’ where no one knows the answers. You ask it about the meaning of life, and it replies with a stock photo of a cat contemplating a sunset. Thanks, AI, but I was hoping for something a bit more profound!

The truth is that faith is deeply personal and subjective. It’s like discussing your favorite ice cream flavor; everyone has an opinion, and somehow, it always ends in a debate over whether mint chocolate chip is actually a legitimate choice. AI doesn’t have personal experiences or beliefs; it can’t feel the warmth of a Sunday service or the peace of a quiet meditation. Instead, it relies on data – and let’s face it, that’s about as comforting as being handed a soggy slice of bread.

When AI tries to tackle questions of faith, it often ends up regurgitating information like a poorly programmed parrot. Sure, it can pull up all the historical facts about religions, the number of followers, and even some inspirational quotes. But when you ask it, “What does faith mean to you?” it freezes like a deer in headlights. It’s almost as if AI is saying, “I compute, therefore I am… confused?”

And what about the controversies? Oh boy, buckle up! AI can inadvertently stir the pot by highlighting contradictions in various beliefs, leading to some serious eyebrow-raising conversations. Imagine an AI chatbot casually dropping, “Well, according to this dataset, your holy text might have some inconsistencies.” That’s like throwing a grenade into a room full of theologians. Yikes!

So, what does this all mean for the future? Should we be worried that our smart assistants will start giving spiritual advice? I mean, if my Alexa starts telling me to meditate while chanting, I might just unplug it. But on the flip side, there’s something intriguing about how AI can help facilitate discussions about faith, providing a platform for different viewpoints without the threat of judgment… unless you count judgment by algorithm.

In conclusion, while AI might stumble when it comes to questions of faith, it certainly keeps things interesting. Just remember, the next time you find yourself in a deep philosophical discussion with your AI assistant, it might be best to steer the conversation back to pizza toppings. At least that way, everyone leaves the table happy, and we avoid a theological food fight!

Inspired by: “AI stumbles on questions of faith” (r/technology)

Hey there, fellow financial adventurers! Buckle up, because we’ve got some exhilarating news straight out of the Land of the Rising Sun. Japan’s Nikkei has just crossed a jaw-dropping 67,000 points, and guess what? It’s all thanks to our pal, Artificial Intelligence (AI). And in the midst of this financial frenzy, SoftBank has decided to wear the crown as the most valuable firm in Japan. So, grab your sushi and let’s dive into this market shake-up!

Related reading: Original source

First off, let’s talk about the Nikkei. If you’re unfamiliar, it’s Japan’s version of the Dow Jones but with more sushi and less cheeseburgers. For the Nikkei to soar past 67,000 points is like watching your favorite anime character finally achieve their dreams after 800 episodes. It’s a big deal! And what’s behind this meteoric rise? You guessed it—AI!

AI isn’t just a buzzword anymore; it’s become the superhero of the stock market! With companies racing to integrate AI into their operations, the Nikkei has become a playground for investors who just can’t resist the allure of tech innovation. It’s like the ultimate tech showdown, with AI strutting in, cape flapping, and declaring, “I’m here to make you rich!” And honestly, who wouldn’t want a piece of that action?

Now, let’s not forget SoftBank. This company is like that friend who always seems to have their life together while you’re still figuring out how to fold a fitted sheet. Rising to be the most valuable firm in Japan is no small feat, and it’s a testament to how SoftBank has capitalized on the AI boom. They’ve put their money where their mouth is—investing heavily in AI startups and tech ventures, proving that they’re not just sitting on a pile of cash like Scrooge McDuck.

But before we all jump on the AI bandwagon, let’s pause for a second. The rise of AI isn’t just a blessing; it brings a fair share of controversy too. There’s a lot of chatter about job displacement and ethical concerns surrounding AI. Are we pushing the boundaries of technology too far, or are we just riding the wave without looking back? It’s like a thrilling roller coaster—fun and terrifying all at once!

In conclusion, Japan’s Nikkei hitting 67,000 is more than a number; it’s a signal of how AI is shaping the financial landscape, with SoftBank leading the charge. So whether you’re an investor, a tech enthusiast, or just someone who enjoys watching the financial world spin like a top, keep your eyes peeled. This is just the beginning of an exciting era where robots and stocks collide. And who knows? Maybe one day, we’ll all be taking investment advice from a friendly AI—just as long as it doesn’t start charging us for every tip!

Inspired by: “Japan’s Nikkei tops 67,000 on AI boost; SoftBank becomes most valuable Japanese firm” (r/technology)

Well, well, well, if it isn’t PewDiePie jumping into the AI game like a cat into a bathtub! You heard it right, folks. The king of YouTube has just launched his very own answer to ChatGPT, and guess what? It’s completely free! Let’s dive into this techy pool of excitement and see if it’s a refreshing splash or just a kiddie pool filled with warm water.

Related reading: Original source

First off, let’s talk about the man himself. PewDiePie, or Felix Kjellberg for the uninitiated, is not just an ordinary YouTube star; he’s a cultural phenomenon. With millions of subscribers and a knack for making memes out of thin air, he’s basically the Willy Wonka of the internet. So, when he decides to step into the AI arena, you can bet your last slice of pizza that people are going to pay attention.

Now, why would PewDiePie launch an AI assistant, you ask? I mean, we already have ChatGPT, Bard, and whatever else is trying to take over our lives. Well, it seems our favorite Swede wants to offer a little something different—something that’s not just another robot spewing out textbook answers. The idea here is to create an AI that feels more like a buddy, someone who might just tell you to stop binge-watching that series and go outside for a jog (or, you know, not).

But wait, hold your horses (or your memes). The real kicker is that it’s free. Yes, you heard me! Free as in “I don’t have to sell my kidney to access it.” This could dramatically shift the AI landscape, especially for those who are tired of the paywall blues. Imagine, an AI that’s just as entertaining as watching PewDiePie play Minecraft (and we all know how chaotic that can get).

But let’s pump the brakes for a second. Just because it’s free doesn’t mean it’s going to be all rainbows and unicorns. There’s always a catch, right? I mean, have you ever tried a “free” sandwich from a questionable food truck? Sometimes, you just end up regretting life choices. Will this AI be robust and reliable, or will it just give you existential dread while quoting random memes? Time will tell.

And what about the community? With Reddit buzzing about this launch, it seems like everyone and their grandma has an opinion. Some are excited to see what PewDiePie can concoct, while others are rolling their eyes and muttering, “Not another influencer trying to solve world problems.” But hey, isn’t that the beauty of the internet? A melting pot of opinions, memes, and the occasional cat video.

In conclusion, PewDiePie’s foray into the AI world could either be a glorious success or a spectacular flop. But one thing is for sure: it’s going to be entertaining to watch. So, grab your snacks and let’s all keep an eye on this interesting experiment. Who knows, maybe one day we’ll have an AI that not only helps us with our tasks but also gives us the motivation to finally finish that Netflix series. Or maybe it’ll just tell us to go touch some grass. Either way, I’m here for it.

Inspired by: “PewDiePie just launched his answer to ChatGPT and it’s completely free” (r/technology)

So, here we are, folks. The Pope—yes, that Pope—decided to drop a wisdom bomb about artificial intelligence, and guess what? The tech titans are about as vocal as a mime in a library. They say silence is golden, but in this case, it might just be a bit suspicious.

Related reading: Original source

Now, before we dive into the juicy details, let’s set the stage. Pope Leo, who I’m pretty sure is not just a fancy hat and robe, issued a warning about the potential risks of AI. And let’s be honest, when a man who has access to a divine hotline starts talking about AI risks, you might want to perk up and listen. But instead of a flurry of tweets, blog posts, or at least a hasty Instagram story, we’re met with crickets from the tech giants. Maybe they’re too busy counting their billions or assembling their next robot overlord.

First off, let’s not pretend there isn’t something deliciously ironic about this situation. We’ve got the Pope—who is supposed to be all about compassion and humanity—calling out AI risks, while the tech moguls, who are supposed to be the guardians of innovation, remain eerily quiet. It’s like watching Batman and Superman stare each other down while a third party—let’s say, a rogue AI—laughs maniacally in the corner.

So, what gives? Are these tech titans too proud to acknowledge a religious figure? Do they fear backlash from the online community? Or are they simply plotting their next multi-billion dollar venture in peace? Whatever the reason, their silence raises a lot of eyebrows and even more questions.

Let’s take a moment to consider the potential risks that Pope Leo highlighted. AI can be a double-edged sword—or, let’s be real, a double-edged laser sword. It has the power to revolutionize industries, but it also poses risks like job displacement, ethical dilemmas, and perhaps the most terrifying of all: self-aware robots that might decide we’re just not that interesting anymore. Imagine a world where your Roomba refuses to clean because it’s too busy contemplating the meaning of life!

Now, if I were a tech titan, I’d be sweating bullets right now. But instead, they’re playing the long game, possibly hoping this will blow over like last week’s TikTok trend. However, ignoring the Pope’s warning doesn’t just put them in hot water with the religious folks; it could also alienate a large section of the public who are concerned about where AI is heading.

Let’s not forget that public perception can be a fickle beast. Remember when Facebook was the cool kid on the block? Now they’re more like that one friend who tells everyone they’re fine while their life is a chaotic mess. Tech leaders need to realize that engaging with these concerns isn’t just about PR—it’s about being responsible stewards of the technology they create.

In conclusion, the silence of the tech titans in the wake of Pope Leo’s warning about AI risks is not just a minor oversight; it could be a signal of something much deeper. Are they too caught up in their own worlds to notice the potential dangers? Or is their silence a calculated move to avoid the spotlight? Either way, it’s time for them to step up and start the conversation. Because trust me, ignoring a Pope is one thing, but ignoring an impending AI crisis? That’s a fool’s errand!

Inspired by: “Tech titans mostly silent after Pope Leo’s warning about risks of AI” (r/technology)

Hey there, tech enthusiasts and geopolitical junkies! So, grab your favorite beverage and let’s dive into this spicy news that’s hotter than a jalapeño in a sauna. The U.S. has decided to put the brakes on Nvidia’s AI chip shipments to Chinese firms outside of China. Yes, you heard me right! It’s like the U.S. just pulled the fire alarm at a tech party.

Related reading: Original source

Now, before we start throwing popcorn at the screen, let’s unpack what this really means. Nvidia, the big daddy of AI chips, has been on a roll, powering everything from your friendly neighborhood gaming rig to massive data centers that could probably run a small country. But hold your horses! The U.S. government has decided that some of these chips might just be too powerful for certain Chinese firms. It’s like saying, “You can’t handle the heat, so stay out of the kitchen!”

So why the sudden change? Well, it seems like the U.S. is trying to play chess while everyone else is playing checkers. With tensions rising between the U.S. and China, particularly over technology and trade, this move could be seen as a strategic maneuver to maintain a competitive edge. After all, AI technology is the new oil, and nobody wants to give away their reserves for free!

But let’s not kid ourselves; this isn’t just about chips and circuits. This is a classic case of geopolitical power play—like a game of tug-of-war, but with way more at stake. The U.S. is concerned that these advanced chips could be used for military purposes or to boost China’s tech industry to levels that might make Uncle Sam sweat a little. And let’s face it, nobody wants to see a scenario where China becomes the reigning champion of AI while the U.S. is left holding the bag. Talk about a plot twist!

Now, here’s where it gets even juicier. Nvidia has been scrambling to adjust its business strategy faster than a cat on a hot tin roof. The company has been trying to find ways to navigate the murky waters of international trade while still keeping its shareholder happy. It’s like walking a tightrope while juggling flaming swords—impressive, but one misstep and things could get messy!

Some people might argue that this move could stifle innovation and create a technological divide between nations. Others might shout, “Hooray for national security!” It’s a classic case of “you say tomato, I say to-mah-to.” But here’s the kicker: tech companies thrive on collaboration across borders. If this trend continues, we could be looking at a future where innovation is bottlenecked, and that’s something nobody wants to see.

In conclusion, as the U.S. takes this bold step to halt Nvidia’s AI chip shipments to Chinese firms outside of China, it’s clear that we are in for a wild ride in the tech world. Whether this will lead to a new era of innovation or a tech cold war remains to be seen. So, buckle up and keep your eyes peeled, folks! This is just the beginning of a thrilling chapter in the saga of tech and trade.

Inspired by: “US takes step to halt Nvidia AI chip shipments to Chinese firms outside China” (r/technology)

Hold onto your hats, folks! At a recent defense forum in Singapore, panelists made a shocking claim: the dangers of artificial intelligence (AI) might just eclipse those of nuclear weapons. Yes, you read that right! We’re talking about the same tech that can recommend your next binge-watch on Netflix or help your grandma order a pizza online. But now, it seems like it could also lead us into a potential apocalypse. Who knew dinner and doom could be so closely linked?

Related reading: Original source

Now, let’s unpack this a bit. The panelists raised alarms about how AI could reduce our reaction times to mere milliseconds. Imagine this: you’re in a high-stakes military scenario, and instead of taking a moment to think, you let a rogue algorithm decide your next move. One wrong reaction, and BOOM – we might not just be talking about a pizza delivery mishap anymore!

So, how exactly does AI lead to hasty decisions? Well, think of it like this: when your phone auto-corrects your text and turns “Let’s meet at 6” into “Let’s meet at the nuclear launch site,” you might not think twice before hitting send. AI is programmed to make snap judgments based on data, which is great for sorting your sock drawer but not so much for handling world peace!

The irony here is rich. We’ve spent decades worrying about nuclear weapons and their devastating consequences, only to now face the possibility that our very own creations could endanger us even more. It’s like being scared of a bear only to trip over a squirrel that’s plotting your demise. The squirrel is cute, but it’s still a threat!

As we dive deeper into this rabbit hole—or should I say, AI hole—let’s not forget that the development of AI is exponentially faster than our ability to regulate it. It’s like giving a toddler a paintbrush and hoping they won’t decide to redecorate the living room with a splash of chaos. We need to be proactive about the ethical implications of AI, or we might find ourselves in a reality where machines are making critical decisions without any human oversight.

But hey, what’s the solution? Should we all go back to using carrier pigeons and smoke signals? Probably not. Instead, we need robust discussions, regulations, and a healthy dose of skepticism about the tech we’re developing. We need to create frameworks that ensure AI works for us, not against us. After all, the last thing we want is for our AI to decide that launching nuclear missiles is a more efficient way to resolve a minor traffic dispute.

As we continue to explore the implications of AI, let’s keep the conversation going. Who knows? Maybe the next panel at a defense forum will have us discussing AI’s potential as a therapist instead. “You’ve got issues? Let’s analyze your past five relationships with data!”

In conclusion, while we may chuckle at the absurdity of AI surpassing nuclear threats, the reality is that we must take this seriously. Our future depends on it, and let’s be honest, we all prefer living in a world where we can binge-watch our shows in peace rather than dodging AI-driven nuclear fallout. So, stay curious, stay informed, and maybe invest in that bomb shelter after all—just in case!

Inspired by: “The dangers of AI eclipsed those of nuclear weapons at a defense forum in Singapore, as panelists w…” (r/technology)

Ah, corporate America, where the stakes are high, and the decisions can be shockingly low. Picture this: a company just casually drops $500 million on Claude AI in a month. Yes, you read that right! That’s not just your average day at the office; that’s like buying a yacht just to store your collection of rubber ducks. So, what exactly happened here? Let’s dive into the delightful chaos.

Related reading: Original source

First off, let’s talk about the elephant in the room—or should I say, the Claude in the boardroom? This AI was supposed to streamline operations, enhance productivity, and maybe even brew the office coffee (okay, that last part might be stretching it). But with no usage limits on licenses, it seems the employees took this as an open invitation to unleash the floodgates of AI chaos.

You can almost picture it: “Hey, why not have Claude draft my emails, write my reports, and maybe even compose a heartfelt sonnet to my cat?” The freedom was intoxicating! And why wouldn’t it be? Who wouldn’t want a digital assistant that can do everything from cooking dinner to solving world hunger (well, maybe not that last one, but you get the point)?”

Now, you might be thinking, “How could such a colossal oversight happen?” Well, my dear friend, this is corporate life we’re talking about! It’s like giving a toddler a box of crayons and telling them to color inside the lines—inevitably, you end up with a Jackson Pollock masterpiece on your walls and crayon bits in places you didn’t even know existed.

Then there’s the question of accountability. I mean, did anyone in the management team think to say, “Hey, maybe we should put a cap on how much Claude can do? Or at least set some ground rules?” A usage limit could have prevented this spending spree that feels more like a binge-watch session of a bad reality show than a strategic investment.

And let’s not forget about the implications for other companies watching this train wreck unfold. You can bet they’re taking notes, probably while shaking their heads in disbelief. “Note to self: when implementing AI, maybe don’t let your employees act like it’s Black Friday every day.”

So, what now? Will the company learn from this expensive lesson? Will they tighten the reins on Claude before he becomes the next corporate diva? Only time will tell! But one thing is for sure: this $500 million blunder will be the topic of boardroom jokes for years to come. “Remember when we thought unlimited AI was a good idea? Good times!”

In conclusion, this saga serves as a reminder that in the wild world of corporate decision-making, sometimes the best-laid plans go hilariously awry. Here’s hoping they get their act together before they blow another half a billion on AI karaoke night!

Inspired by: “Company Blew $500M On Claude AI In One Month Due To No Usage Limit On Licenses For Employees” (r/technology)

Hey there, tech enthusiasts! Grab your calculators and put on your thinking caps because we’re diving into a topic that sounds like it’s straight out of a sci-fi novel — Chinese authorities have just released guidelines for AI metrology capacity building! Wow, that’s a mouthful, isn’t it? But let’s break it down like we’re in a high school science class, shall we?

Related reading: Original source

First off, what on earth is metrology? Well, it’s the science of measurement. You know, the thing that keeps your baking recipes from turning into a disaster when you accidentally measure a cup of salt instead of sugar. Imagine a world where everything is measured precisely, thanks to the magic of AI. Sounds dreamy, right? Or perhaps a bit too much like Skynet is getting its fingers into our measuring cups.

So, why is China making a big fuss about this? Well, in a world where technology is advancing faster than you can say “quantum computing,” precision in measurements is critical. Think of it as the difference between building a spaceship that lands on Mars and one that lands in your neighbor’s backyard. No one wants that kind of awkwardness, especially if your neighbor is a NASA enthusiast.

The guidelines aim to bolster the country’s capabilities in AI-driven measurement systems, making sure that every nut, bolt, and slice of tofu is accurately measured. This is particularly vital for industries like manufacturing, healthcare, and even agriculture. But let’s be honest, how long before someone uses AI to accurately measure the perfect amount of soy sauce for your stir-fry? Because that’s the real innovation we’re waiting for!

Now, here comes the juicy part — implementing these guidelines means a massive investment in technology and training. It’s like when your friend decides to take up yoga and suddenly you’re expected to join them for a 6 AM class. Not that I’m complaining; I could use the flexibility! But seriously, this is going to require a lot of resources and perhaps a few frustrated engineers along the way.

Moreover, while China is making strides in this area, it raises questions about the global landscape. Will other countries follow suit and develop their own metrology guidelines? Or will we find ourselves in a quirky global competition to see who can measure the best? Picture an Olympics for measurements — gold medals for the most precise nanometers!

In conclusion, China’s guidelines for AI metrology capacity building could either revolutionize the way we measure things or become just another bureaucratic checklist collecting dust. Time will tell if this initiative leads to groundbreaking advancements or just another case of “we made a fancy plan but forgot to execute it.” But hey, at least we’ll always have the option of relying on our trusty measuring cups, right?

So, what do you think? Is this the future of measurement or just a fancy way to impress your friends with big words? Let me know in the comments below!

Inspired by: “Chinese authorities release guidelines for AI metrology capacity building” (r/technology)

Ah, Harvard. The land of the Ivy League, where students are practically born with a briefcase in one hand and a philosophy degree in the other. So, what happens when a graduation speaker decides to throw a literary Molotov cocktail into the crowd? Enter the profanity-laden tirade against AI that had students cheering like they were at a rock concert.

Related reading: Original source

Imagine this: a prestigious graduation ceremony, parents in their Sunday best, and a speaker who’s obviously had one too many espressos before stepping up to the mic. This speaker, with the charisma of a caffeinated raccoon, declared, “I’m here to tell you the mission of your generation is to destroy AI!” Well, well, well, that escalated quickly.

Now, let’s unpack this a bit. Why would a graduation speaker go off the rails on a subject that’s essentially the talk of the town (or maybe just the tech-savvy coffee shops)? Perhaps it’s the growing fear that AI is coming for our jobs, our creativity, and our very essence as humans. You know, the usual dystopian nightmare stuff.

But let’s be real here. AI isn’t the enemy—it’s more like that overly eager intern who just refuses to take a day off. Sure, it’s got some quirks, like writing entire essays in seconds or generating cat memes that are eerily accurate. But isn’t that what we wanted? A sidekick that never asks for a raise?

As the audience erupted into cheers, it was clear that this speaker was tapping into a vein of anxiety that runs deep in the hearts of many. The younger generation is faced with questions like: Will robots take over the world? Will I still have a job after graduation? And more importantly, who will feed the cats?

But before we grab our pitchforks and torches, let’s consider the other side. AI isn’t just about taking jobs; it’s also about creating opportunities. Think of it as a tool—like a Swiss army knife, but instead of a bottle opener, it has machine learning algorithms. It can help us solve problems faster, make life easier, and yes, even help us procrastinate with style.

So, while the speaker’s message resonated with many, it’s essential to remember that a blanket war on AI could be a tad overkill. Maybe instead of “destroying AI,” we should aim for “coexisting with our robot overlords.”

In conclusion, the graduation speaker’s passionate rant was a reflection of the fears that many hold in today’s rapidly changing world. But let’s not throw the baby out with the bathwater—or the AI out with the algorithms. At the end of the day, we’re all just trying to find our place in a world that’s becoming increasingly automated. And who knows? Maybe one day, our AI friends will even help us with our laundry.

Inspired by: “Harvard Graduation Speaker Unloads on AI in Profanity-Loaded Tirade, Prompting Cheers From Students…” (r/technology)