Skip to content President Donald Trump and New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani speak to reporters at Gracie Mansion, Monday, Sept. 21, 2026, in New York. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) By Associated Press PUBLISHED: September 23, 2026 at 4:42 PM CDT | UPDATED: September 23, 2026 at 5:31 PM CDT Getting your Trinity Audio player ready…
Well, folks, it looks like the legal rollercoaster just took another unexpected dip, and this time, it’s Donald Trump who’s in the front row screaming. An Iowa judge has officially dismissed Trump’s lawsuit against The Des Moines Register and pollster Ann Selzer, and let me tell you, the courtroom drama was more riveting than a season finale of your favorite reality show.
So, what exactly went down? In a lawsuit that could only be described as extraordinary (in the sense that it was a little out there), Trump alleged that The Des Moines Register misrepresented the state of the 2024 presidential race. He claimed this misrepresentation was a violation of Iowa’s consumer fraud law. Yes, consumer fraud. Because apparently, when it comes to presidential elections, newspapers are now selling us faulty products?
But alas, the judge was having none of it. After a brief examination of the claims, the ruling came down faster than a toddler after a sugar rush: dismissed. The judge pointed out that the claims didn’t really hold up in the court of law, which is a fancy way of saying, “Nice try, but no cigar.”
This isn’t the first time Trump has thrown a legal tantrum over media coverage. In fact, it seems like he’s been filing lawsuits against media organizations like they’re going out of style. It’s almost like he thinks if he can’t win in the polls, he can at least win in court. Spoiler alert: that strategy doesn’t seem to be working either.
Now, let’s take a moment to appreciate the irony here. Trump, a man who has spent a significant portion of his career criticizing the media, is now trying to use the law to silence them. It’s a classic case of “I can dish it out, but I can’t take it.” It’s almost as if he thinks the First Amendment only applies to his tweets.
But back to the ruling. The judge’s decision is a reminder that courts are not playgrounds for political grievances. They’re serious places where serious matters are adjudicated. And while Trump might have been hoping for a sympathetic ear, he instead got a judge who apparently subscribes to the notion that just because you’re rich and famous doesn’t mean you get to rewrite the rules of journalism.
As we look ahead to the 2024 election cycle, this ruling could have implications beyond just one man’s legal woes. It raises questions about how media organizations report on elections and how public figures respond to that coverage. Will Trump continue to fire off lawsuits like confetti at a parade? Or will he take a step back and rethink his strategy?
Only time will tell. But for now, it seems like the only thing that’s been misrepresented here is Trump’s chances in court. So, to all the legal eagles and political pundits out there, keep your eyes peeled. This isn’t the last we’ll hear from Trump, and I can guarantee you, it won’t be boring.
In the meantime, let’s all take a moment to appreciate the fact that, despite the chaos, the law is still doing its job. And who knows? Maybe the next judge will have a little more patience for his antics. But I wouldn’t bet on it.
Inspired by: “Iowa judge dismisses Trump’s lawsuit against Des Moines Register and pollster” (r/News)