Category: Cybersecurity

Cornell Concluded Defendant Newell Had Sex with Jane Doe Without Consent Camila Cabello vs. Layla Taylor Who’d You Rather?! (Corset Cuties Edition) Ken Urker’s Landlord Asked Family For His Rent, One Week After He Died Can You Guess The Sexy Singer Bustin’ Out Of Her Pink Bra?!

Well, folks, it seems that not every concert goes off without a hitch. Country singer Ella Langley, in a plot twist that no one saw coming (except maybe her security team), canceled her highly anticipated show in Tulsa, Oklahoma, just hours before it was set to kick off. And what was the culprit behind this abrupt decision? A ‘serious security threat.’ Yikes!

Now, before you start imagining wild scenarios involving rogue fans with too much time on their hands or a disgruntled ex with a penchant for drama, let’s get one thing straight: the specifics of the threat remain under wraps. It’s like that one friend who always leaves you hanging with juicy gossip but never spills the beans.

Ella, along with the local authorities, venue officials, and her own security team, decided that the safety of everyone involved—fans, staff, and, of course, the star herself—was the top priority. Let’s face it, no one wants to be the headliner at a concert where everyone’s more worried about their safety than the setlist.

This isn’t the first time we’ve seen concerts canceled due to security concerns, and it certainly won’t be the last. In an era where safety is paramount, artists and venues are taking these threats seriously. So, if you were hoping to sing along to Ella’s tunes and maybe even shed a tear during that one emotional ballad, you’ll have to put those plans on hold. It’s not every day that a concert gets canceled last minute, but when it does, it’s usually for a good reason—like, you know, keeping people alive and well.

So, what’s next for Ella? Hopefully, she’ll reschedule the show and give her fans the concert they deserve. But let’s keep our fingers crossed that the next time she hits the stage, it’s not under the shadow of a security threat. Until then, we’ll just have to live with the disappointment—much like that time you found out the ice cream shop was out of your favorite flavor.

In the meantime, let’s send some good vibes to Ella and her team. After all, safety first, even if it means disappointing a few fans and leaving them hanging. Here’s hoping for a speedy resolution and a triumphant return to the stage!

Inspired by: “Ella Langley Abruptly Cancels Tulsa Show Due to ‘Serious Security Threat’” (r/Entertainment)

Linkedin Naver RSS Twitter Home Threats Cyber Attacks Vulnerabilities Breaches Top 10 Search Cyber Security News Latest Cyber Security News Friday, October 9, 2026 Linkedin RSS Twitter WhatsApp Google News Google News Cyber Security News Latest Cyber Security News Home Threats Cyber Attacks Vulnerabilities Breaches Top 10 Follow on LinkedIn Search Home Cyber Attack News ShinyHunters Allegedly Claims Breach of FBI Jobs Site and Stolen Agents’ Data By Guru Baran September 23, 2026 The FBI is inves

Well, folks, it seems like the FBI has decided to play a little game of catch-up, and they’ve just nabbed a suspect involved in the infamous ShinyHunters hack. If you haven’t heard of ShinyHunters, they’re not a trendy new fitness class or the latest TikTok dance; they’re actually a hacking group that recently took a stab at the FBI’s jobs portal. Yes, you heard that right—the FBI’s jobs portal. Because who wouldn’t want to break into a site that’s essentially a digital help-wanted sign for the nation’s top law enforcement agency?

So, what exactly happened? Last month, ShinyHunters managed to breach the FBI’s jobs portal, and in the process, they reportedly acquired sensitive data on nearly all FBI employees. That’s right, nearly everyone—imagine the awkward family dinners when someone brings up the hack. “Hey, Uncle Bob, remember that time you worked for the FBI and got your info stolen by a bunch of internet trolls?” Awkward.

The hack occurred on a platform managed by a third-party vendor, which is just a fancy way of saying that the FBI might need to rethink their outsourcing strategy. I mean, if you can’t trust the vendor to keep your jobs portal safe, are they really a vendor or just a glorified babysitter?

In the aftermath, the FBI has launched a global investigation to track down the remaining members of the ShinyHunters group. This sounds like the start of a bad buddy cop movie, where the FBI agents are trying to figure out how to take down a group of hackers who are probably sitting in their parents’ basements eating Cheetos and laughing at the chaos they’ve caused.

It’s almost poetic, isn’t it? The FBI, the agency that’s supposed to catch the bad guys, getting outsmarted by a group of hackers who probably have more time on their hands than they know what to do with. It’s like watching a lion trying to catch a particularly agile gazelle, only to realize that the gazelle has been watching a lot of parkour videos online.

As the investigation unfolds, we can only wait and see what comes next. Will the FBI catch the rest of the ShinyHunters? Will they find out how the hackers managed to pull off this elaborate scheme? Or will it turn out that the hackers just had a really good Wi-Fi connection?

In the meantime, let’s keep our fingers crossed that the FBI learns a thing or two about cybersecurity from this little escapade. Because if they don’t, who knows? Maybe next time they’ll get hacked by a group of kids playing Fortnite.

Inspired by: “FBI arrests suspect in ShinyHunters hack of the bureau’s jobs portal” (r/World)

Image source, Getty Images By Laura Cress Technology reporter Published 2 hours ago Three former OpenAI researchers sacked for allegedly mishandling information claim they were instead let go because they raised safety concerns at the tech firm.

In a world where tech companies often find themselves embroiled in ethical dilemmas, OpenAI has recently found itself in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. The company has defended its decision to fire three safety researchers, labeling the dismissals a ‘breach of trust.’ Now, before you start imagining a high-stakes corporate drama akin to a reality TV show, let’s break down what actually happened here.

OpenAI claims that the firings were not retaliation for the researchers raising valid safety concerns. But, of course, the researchers have a different story to tell. Because who doesn’t love a good he-said-she-said moment in the corporate world? It’s almost like watching a soap opera, minus the dramatic music and over-the-top plot twists.

The company’s stance is that trust was breached, but the researchers argue that their concerns about safety protocols were ignored—cue the eye rolls. It’s like when you try to tell your friend that the new restaurant they’ve been raving about has terrible reviews, and they insist it’s the best thing since sliced bread. Spoiler alert: sometimes, it’s not.

So, what does this all mean for OpenAI? Well, it raises some serious questions about transparency and accountability, two words that every tech company loves to throw around but often forget to practice. When safety researchers, who are essentially the watchdogs in the rapidly evolving AI landscape, feel the need to voice concerns, it’s usually a sign that something is amiss. And firing them? That’s like throwing out the fire alarm because you don’t want to hear it go off.

This situation also highlights the age-old question of corporate loyalty versus ethical responsibility. Should researchers prioritize their jobs or the safety of the technology they’re working on? It’s a dilemma that many in the tech industry face, and unfortunately, it seems OpenAI is not immune to it. In a field where the stakes are incredibly high, the last thing we need is a culture of fear where employees are afraid to speak up.

As the dust settles, it will be interesting to see how this situation unfolds. Will OpenAI take steps to mend fences and reassure its remaining employees that they can voice their concerns without fear of retribution? Or will this incident become a cautionary tale about the importance of listening to the people who are, you know, actually working on safety measures?

In conclusion, while OpenAI may have labeled the firings a ‘breach of trust,’ it’s clear that there are deeper issues at play. The tech community will be watching closely to see how OpenAI navigates this situation, and whether it can restore faith among its employees and the public. After all, in the world of AI, trust is not just a nice-to-have; it’s a must-have. Let’s hope they figure that out before the next round of firings.

Inspired by: “OpenAI defended firing three safety researchers, calling it a ‘breach of trust’” (r/Lifestyle)

Skip to main content Skip to news navigation, settings and search Explore the ABC Loading ABC News News Home Here’s what the Qantas cyber attack may mean for your data and what to do to protect yourself Share Share article Here’s what the Qantas cyber attack may mean for your data and what to do to protect yourself By business reporters Stephanie Chalmers and Emilia Terzon Topic: Cyber Security Posted Thu 3 Jul 2025 at 5:21am Thu 3 Jul 2025 at 5:21am Thu 3 Jul 2025 at 5:21am , updated Thu 3 Jul

Well, folks, grab your popcorn because we’ve got a real-life thriller unfolding in the world of cybersecurity. Last week, a suspected member of the notorious hacking group ShinyHunters, named Saif al-Din Khader, was apprehended in Jordan. Now, before you start picturing him as a villain straight out of a spy movie, let’s unpack what really happened.

Khader’s arrest is linked to a cyberattack on Qantas that occurred back in June 2025. Yes, you heard that right—2025. It seems like just yesterday we were worried about Y2K and now we’re dealing with hackers who seem to have time-traveled from the future. But I digress.

So how did Khader and his merry band of hackers manage to infiltrate a major airline? According to reports, it all started when an employee at an offshore call center was tricked into connecting a malicious tool to the Salesforce platform. Now, let’s take a moment to appreciate the irony here. A company that prides itself on its customer service fell victim to a classic case of social engineering. It’s like being served a gourmet meal only to find out it’s been cooked by someone who couldn’t tell the difference between salt and sugar.

Now that Khader is in custody, he’s decided to cooperate with the FBI. This is where things get interesting. Authorities are hoping that Khader’s information will lead them to other members of the ShinyHunters gang. It’s like a game of cyber dominoes—one falls, and the rest might just tumble down. And let’s be honest, if you’re a hacker and your buddy gets caught, you might want to start looking over your shoulder.

This arrest is not just a win for the FBI; it’s a wake-up call for companies everywhere. If a major airline can be compromised this way, what does that say about your local coffee shop’s cybersecurity measures? Are they still using the password ‘password123’?

As authorities dig deeper into this case, they’re hinting that “more arrests are on the table.” So, if you’re part of the ShinyHunters crew, it might be a good idea to turn off your Wi-Fi and go off the grid for a while. Or, you know, consider a career change. Maybe start a podcast about your life on the run? Just a thought.

In conclusion, the Qantas hack serves as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities that exist in our increasingly digital world. It’s not just about having the latest software or the strongest firewall; it’s also about educating employees and ensuring they’re not falling for the oldest tricks in the book. Let’s face it: if you can fool someone into connecting a rogue tool to Salesforce, you can probably convince them that they’ve just won a million dollars from a Nigerian prince. Stay safe out there, folks!

Inspired by: “‘More arrests are on the table’: Qantas hack gang member nabbed” (r/Local)

Sep 3, 2026 … Iran launches fresh attacks targeting bases used by US forces in the Gulf as Trump threatens further strikes, while China and Egypt call for …

So, it seems like Camp David has once again become the go-to spot for top-secret meetings. You know, the kind where everyone pretends they’re not discussing world affairs while sipping overpriced coffee in the woods. This time, the topic on the agenda was none other than Iran and Yemen, two hotspots that are about as easy to navigate as a toddler in a candy store.

According to sources (because every good story needs a mysterious ‘source’), Trump’s top national security aides gathered at this iconic presidential retreat to tackle these pressing issues. You have to wonder how many rounds of golf were played in between serious discussions. I mean, who doesn’t love a little leisure time while contemplating international chaos?

The meeting, which was kept under wraps like a secret family recipe, involved the likes of Trump and his trusted advisors. It’s like a reality show but with fewer camera angles and more geopolitical tension. Iran and Yemen are not exactly light topics; they’re more like the heavy lifting of international relations.

Let’s break it down: Iran, with its nuclear ambitions and penchant for making headlines, is always a hot potato. Meanwhile, Yemen is embroiled in a humanitarian crisis that’s been going on longer than your average Netflix binge-watch. So, you can see why the aides felt the need to huddle up in the rustic charm of Camp David, away from the prying eyes of the media and those pesky Twitter notifications.

One can only imagine the conversations that took place. “So, how do we handle Iran without starting World War III?” might have been a popular one. And let’s not forget Yemen, where the situation is so complicated that even a seasoned diplomat might throw their hands up in frustration.

This secret meeting could lead to some significant policy decisions, or it could just be another episode of ‘Let’s Pretend We Know What We’re Doing.’ Either way, the stakes are high, and the world is watching.

So, as we await the outcomes of this clandestine gathering, let’s hope that whatever decisions come out of Camp David are more than just a bunch of talking heads throwing around buzzwords. Because if history has taught us anything, it’s that international relations require more than just coffee and camaraderie — they need real solutions. And maybe a touch of humor to lighten the mood.

Stay tuned, folks. The next episode of ‘As the World Turns’ in international politics is just around the corner, and you won’t want to miss it!

Inspired by: “Scoop: Trump’s top national security aides meet secretly at Camp David on Iran, Yemen” (r/News)

A FlashLoopAdapter exploit drains 114.09 ETH worth about $305,000 from two Safe wallets linked to Aave V3 strategies .

In a plot twist that even the best cyber thriller writers would envy, a new exploit linked to Aave has managed to drain a staggering $305,000 worth of Ethereum (that’s about 114 ETH for those keeping score) from two Safe wallets. Yes, you heard that right—$305K, poof, gone! It’s like a magician’s trick, but instead of pulling a rabbit out of a hat, this hacker pulled a whole lot of cash out of wallets.

So how did this happen? Well, it turns out that the hacker had a few tricks up their sleeve. They exploited a third-party adapter associated with Aave V3, which is basically a fancy way of saying they found a loophole in the system. Think of it like finding a backdoor into a nightclub that’s supposed to be exclusive. Instead of flashing a VIP pass, this hacker just waltzed in and bypassed a contract check like it was no big deal. And just like that, they unlocked the collateral in the wallets, leaving the owners with nothing but a sad, empty digital purse.

Now, before you start throwing your computer out the window in frustration, let’s take a moment to appreciate the response from Aave’s founder, Stani Kulechov. He reassured everyone that the attack didn’t affect Aave V3’s core functionality. So, if you were worried about Aave itself collapsing like a house of cards, you can breathe a sigh of relief. It’s like the captain of the Titanic reassuring passengers that the ship is still unsinkable, even after hitting an iceberg.

But let’s be real here—this incident raises some eyebrows about the security of third-party adapters. If a hacker can just waltz in and make off with hundreds of thousands of dollars, it begs the question: how safe are our assets in this brave new world of decentralized finance?

As the crypto world continues to evolve, so do the tactics of those with less-than-honorable intentions. It’s like a game of cat and mouse, except the cat is a hacker with a penchant for digital theft, and the mouse is, well, your hard-earned crypto.

For those of you who might be tempted to throw caution to the wind and dive headfirst into the world of DeFi, remember to keep your wallets close and your passwords closer. And maybe invest in a good security protocol or two. Because let’s face it, in the world of cryptocurrency, it’s better to be safe than sorry.

In conclusion, while the Aave-linked exploit may have stolen a hefty sum, it also serves as a wake-up call for all of us. It’s a reminder to stay vigilant and keep our digital assets under lock and key. Because in the end, if it can happen to someone else, it can happen to you. And nobody wants to be the punchline of a crypto joke.

Inspired by: “Aave-Linked Exploit Drains $305K in ETH From Safe Wallet” (r/Crypto)

May 22, 2023 … I am a hacker, and I have successfully gained access to your operating system. … can hack through apple or samsung systems i think its good.

In a world where hacking seems to be the new Olympic sport, NEAR Intents has decided to take a bold stance against cybercriminals. On Friday, general manager Alex Shevchenko made a rather dramatic announcement that sent shockwaves through the crypto community: “We have identified you, sir.” Yes, you heard that right. The NEAR Intents team claims they’ve pinpointed the hacker who made off with a staggering $3.8 million from their protocol.

Now, this isn’t your average run-of-the-mill heist. This is a whopping $3.8 million! That’s enough to buy a small island or at least a decent-sized yacht to sail away from your problems—if you were the hacker, that is. But instead of just letting the hacker live his best life, NEAR Intents has opted for a more confrontational approach. They’ve issued a 48-hour ultimatum. Talk about putting the pressure on.

So what does this ultimatum entail? Well, it’s not like they’re asking for a cup of sugar. NEAR Intents is demanding that the hacker return the stolen funds. And honestly, who wouldn’t want to return a small fortune that you’ve stolen? It’s like finding a wallet full of cash and deciding to return it—except this wallet is a digital one, and the cash is just a few lines of code away.

Shevchenko’s announcement has sparked a flurry of reactions online. Some folks are praising NEAR Intents for their bravery, while others are just sitting back with popcorn, eagerly waiting to see how this drama will unfold. Will the hacker return the funds? Will they just laugh in the face of authority and disappear into the dark web? The possibilities are endless!

But let’s take a moment to appreciate the sheer audacity of hacking protocols in the first place. It’s like robbing a bank but without the need for a ski mask or a getaway car. You can just sit in your pajamas, sipping your coffee, and pull off a digital heist. The world we live in, right?

NEAR Intents is certainly not the first protocol to face such a breach, and they probably won’t be the last. However, their decision to go public with an ultimatum is noteworthy. It’s a bit like calling out the school bully in front of everyone—sure, it’s brave, but it also puts a giant target on your back.

The next 48 hours will be crucial for NEAR Intents and their efforts to reclaim the stolen funds. Will they manage to track down this elusive hacker? Or will they be left twiddling their thumbs while the hacker continues to enjoy his ill-gotten gains?

As we wait for the clock to tick down, one thing is for sure: the crypto world is never short on drama. So grab your snacks, keep your eyes peeled, and let’s see how this story unfolds. Who knows, maybe there’s a movie deal in the works for the next big crypto heist—and NEAR Intents might just be the star of the show!

Inspired by: “NEAR Intents says its identified the hacker, gives 48-hour ultimatum” (r/Crypto)

MetaMask Staking (formerly Consensys Staking) is proactively exiting its Ethereum validators from the Lido protocol following an infrastructure security incident disclosed on September 30, 2026. The operator confirmed no immediate threat to user wallets because its non-custodial model does not hold client withdrawal keys, though it suspects compromised signing infrastructure may have diverted small block rewards. Affected validators are expected to complete their exit by October 7, with a full re-entry cycle potentially taking up to 45 days due to Ethereum’s extended entry queue. While stETH holders are advised that no action is required, the precautionary shutdown may result in foregone staking rewards and potential downtime penalties for the operators.

If you’ve been keeping an eye on the crypto world recently, you might have caught wind of a little drama involving MetaMask and its decision to withdraw from the Lido protocol. Yes, folks, it seems that even in the realm of digital wallets and Ethereum, there are moments that make you want to clutch your pearls and gasp.

So, what exactly happened? Well, MetaMask, the popular Ethereum wallet, has decided to pull its validators from Lido after a security incident raised some eyebrows. But before you start panicking and imagining your precious crypto floating away into the ether, let me assure you—there’s no immediate threat to your user wallets. Phew!

Now, let’s break this down. The incident in question was serious enough for MetaMask to take action, but not so dire that they’re sounding the alarm bells for every user. They’ve stated they’re working with external partners to tackle the issue, which sounds fancy and reassuring, right? Who wouldn’t want a team of experts on the case? It’s like calling in the Ghostbusters, but for crypto security.

The exit process from Lido is expected to take up to 45 days. Yes, you read that right. In the fast-paced world of crypto, where things can change in the blink of an eye, 45 days feels like an eternity. But hey, good things come to those who wait—or so they say.

Now, let’s talk numbers. Approximately 0.36 ETH was diverted in block-production payments due to this little hiccup. While that might not seem like a lot in the grand scheme of Ethereum’s fluctuating value, it’s still enough to make any crypto enthusiast raise an eyebrow. It’s like finding out your favorite snack has been mysteriously reduced in size—slightly annoying, but not the end of the world.

The crypto community is buzzing with opinions about this incident. Some are scratching their heads, wondering how something like this could happen in the first place. Others are praising MetaMask’s proactive approach to security. It’s a classic case of ‘you can’t please everyone,’ but at least they’re trying!

In conclusion, while the MetaMask exit from Lido validators might sound alarming at first, it’s actually a prudent move in response to a security issue. They’re ensuring the safety of their users while navigating the choppy waters of crypto security. So, if you’re a MetaMask user, take a deep breath and relax. Your wallets are safe, and the MetaMask team is on the case—like digital superheroes, minus the capes. Stay tuned, folks, because in the world of crypto, there’s always more drama on the horizon!

Inspired by: “MetaMask Staking exits its Lido validators following a security incident” (r/Crypto)

Checkmate is the decisive move in chess that places the opponent’s king in an inescapable attack, symbolizing total defeat or victory. The phrase "Checkmate or Check Your Security" likely draws on Garry Kasparov’s legacy as a former World Chess Champion to metaphorically frame cybersecurity challenges as strategic battles where failure to defend results in total loss. This context highlights the intersection of high-stakes strategic thinking and modern digital security threats.

So, it seems the world of chess has taken a rather dramatic turn lately. Garry Kasparov, the chess grandmaster turned political activist, recently received a rather alarming message from US and Lithuanian security services. Apparently, he’s on some sort of ‘hit list’—and not the good kind you’d hope for in a game of chess.

Now, for those of you who might not be familiar with Kasparov, he’s not just any chess player. He’s a legend, a former world champion, and a vocal critic of Vladimir Putin. You could say he’s the king of the chessboard, but not so much in Putin’s kingdom. It seems that speaking out against the Kremlin can come with some serious consequences, and Kasparov is learning this the hard way.

According to reports, both US and Lithuanian security services have warned Kasparov that his life is in danger. Yes, that’s right—while most of us are just trying to dodge the occasional traffic ticket, Kasparov is ramping up his security measures to avoid being the target of an assassination plot. Talk about a game of high stakes!

Kasparov took to social media to share this news, and let’s just say, he’s not exactly thrilled about it. I mean, who would be? It’s one thing to lose a chess match; it’s another to lose your life. But if you think about it, perhaps this is just another strategic move in the grand game of geopolitics. After all, when you’ve got a pawn that’s become a major player on the global stage, it’s only natural that the king would want to eliminate the threat.

But let’s pause for a second. How does one even prepare for such a situation? I can imagine Kasparov now, practicing his best ‘don’t mess with me’ face while also considering some serious upgrades to his security detail. Maybe he’ll hire a few bodyguards who can also play chess—because let’s be honest, if anyone’s going to protect you from a potential assassin, it might as well be someone who can think three moves ahead.

In all seriousness, though, this situation underscores the very real dangers faced by those who dare to challenge authoritarian regimes. It’s a stark reminder that while we may be debating the finer points of chess strategies, others are fighting for their lives and their freedom. And while Kasparov may be able to dodge bullets like he dodges chess pieces, it’s a sobering reality that he’s living in a world where speaking out can be a matter of life and death.

So, what’s next for Kasparov? Well, he’s going to have to keep an eye on his security, stay alert, and probably avoid any suspicious-looking chess players who might be lurking around. And for the rest of us? We can only hope that the game of chess remains just that—a game, and not a dangerous reality for those who dare to speak their minds.

In the end, let’s just hope that Kasparov can continue to play his game without having to worry about any unwanted checkmates off the board. Who knew chess could be this intense? But then again, in the world of politics, every move counts. So here’s to hoping that Kasparov stays safe and keeps making his moves—on and off the board!

Inspired by: “Putin plot to kill Garry Kasparov: Russian chess legend is warned to take urgent security precautio…” (r/News)

4 hours ago … However, the nine-month wait for Mamdani comes amid a broader trend of lengthy delays in the issuance of federal security clearances. According …

Well, folks, it’s official! Mayor Zohran Mamdani of New York City has finally received his long-awaited federal security clearance. Yes, you heard that right. After approximately nine months of waiting (that’s longer than some sitcoms take to get renewed), Mamdani can now dive into the thrilling world of classified briefings. Because nothing says ‘I’m ready to lead’ quite like being cleared to know what’s going on behind the scenes of national security.

So, what happened during these nine months? Did he lose his paperwork in a pile of takeout menus? Did someone forget to check a box on a form? Or was it just the federal government being, well, the federal government? You know, the same folks who can’t seem to deliver your package on time but can hold up a security clearance for nearly a year.

Mamdani himself confirmed this milestone during a press conference, probably with a sigh of relief that he can now access information that could have been useful—oh, I don’t know—months ago? It’s not like the city has faced any significant challenges recently, right?

This announcement comes hot on the heels of a not-so-secret little powwow between Mamdani and former President Trump at Gracie Mansion. Yes, that’s right, just a week after their ‘bro summit’ (which I can only assume involved a lot of awkward small talk and Trump’s favorite snacks), Mamdani is now armed with the classified intel he was previously denied. Talk about a quick turnaround!

Now, let’s take a moment to appreciate the irony here. The mayor of one of the largest cities in the world was operating without the same access to information that even your average government employee might have. It’s like being the captain of a ship without a map—sure, you can steer, but good luck avoiding the iceberg!

So, what does this mean for New York City? Well, for starters, Mamdani can now receive briefings on potential threats. That’s right, folks, he’s officially in the loop! One can only hope that this newfound access will help him make more informed decisions, especially with all the chaos that can pop up in a city that never sleeps.

In the end, let’s give a round of applause to Mayor Mamdani for finally getting his clearance. It’s a reminder that even in the fast-paced world of politics, sometimes you just have to wait your turn. Here’s hoping that the next time he needs something important, it doesn’t take as long as it takes to finish a Netflix series. Cheers to progress, and may the classified information be ever in your favor, Mr. Mayor!

Inspired by: “Mamdani finally gets federal security clearance week after Gracie Mansion bro summit with Trump” (r/Entertainment)